i can beat to magnus carlsen but don´t let me access to elite

Sort:
JohnnyKGB

Hello guys,  i can beat to magnus carlsen, i know because i was watching their games and now i know how to refutate all the system of this guy.  Also i am training with houdini and others programs and they tell me that my level is 2919  better than carlsen.  

What can i do?   The three KKK  and Carlsen don´t let me access to the private tournaments like  Wijk Aan Zee ,  can you help me?   I am sure i can beat to magnus carlsen .

Kingdom_Hearts

Beat Stockfish 5 on the hardest level and maybe you'll get someone's attention? 

kco

Just keep on dreaming.

EricFleet

They will not let you play because they are scared of you. I have it on highest authority that Carlsen has been installed by the illuminati and have blackballed you because of your skill.  I would not recommend trying to enter such a tournament or bad things will happen to you.

DrSpudnik

You should complain to random strangers in a subway station. Maybe one can help.

En_Garde_2014

You couldn't beat your mammy

Aidilein

I have the same problem! smh

DrCheckevertim
EricFleet wrote:

They will not let you play because they are scared of you. I have it on highest authority that Carlsen has been installed by the illuminati and have blackballed you because of your skill.  I would not recommend trying to enter such a tournament or bad things will happen to you.

lol

DrCheckevertim
JohnnyKGB wrote:

Hello guys,  i can beat to magnus carlsen, i know because i was watching their games and now i know how to refutate all the system of this guy.

Carlsen doesn't have a "system," bud.

Whatever moves you play, he will just play better ones.

yedddy

why is no one taking this chap seriously?? if he says he can beat this magnus fellow then we should believe him.

yedddy
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

913Glorax12
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

Wow you're rude

kco
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

Wow you're rude

Wow, you guys are pathetic.

913Glorax12
kco wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

Wow you're rude

Wow, you guys are pathetic.

Wow, how orginial

913Glorax12
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

Is idiot, moron, and stupid silly names?

Intresting

yedddy
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence.

913Glorax12
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence. (or lack of)

blueemu
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

Under the right circumstances, yes. I would have beaten Tal if I'd had another five minutes on my clock.

...

...

...

... it was a clock simul game, and I was up K+R+P+P+P vs K+B+N (no other pieces or pawns left on the board) but my flag was hanging so I had to just vacuum all the pieces off the board to draw by bare kings... it was either that, or lose on time.

yedddy
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence. (or lack of)

i appreciate you editing my post but i liked it the way i worded it, thanks.

913Glorax12
yedddy wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence. (or lack of)

[really] appreciate you editing my post but i liked it the way i worded it, thanks.

No problem! I am always on everyone's side!