Forums

I DEFEATED THE LEVEL 15 CHESS COMPUTER!!!!!!!!

Sort:
tornado81

TONIGHT AT 9:38 PM IN 16 MOVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE GAME WENT AS FOLLOWS: 

Nekhemevich

something wrong with move 11 on my end.

DoctorKraken42

perhaps you meant to type Rad1?

chessfreak

Weak computer.

Dale

I think I almost had the exact same game against a Radio Shack computer about 25 years ago.

BirdBrain

Dale wrote:

I think I almost had the exact same game against a Radio Shack computer about 25 years ago.

Agreed. I used to be able to do the same attack and mate multiple times, since it would play the same moves each time.

Howevr, congrats!

codexone

-_- 

tornado81

Yeah it was Rad1. my mistake. but it doesn't really matter that much. Thank you bird :) chessfreak: my first two attempts at beating it, first of which only lasted 29 moves and my loss, second of which lasted 46 moves and another loss, says something else entirely. and the fact that i'd never been able to beat it in previous attempts. not that it isn't strong or weak. i just played all the right moves and the computer played the wrong moves. It lost on 11... Qe8, shutting its king in so it had no escape. 

chessfreak

tornado81 wrote:

Yeah it was Rad1. my mistake. but it doesn't really matter that much. Thank you bird :) chessfreak: my first two attempts at beating it, first of which only lasted 29 moves and my loss, second of which lasted 46 moves and another loss, says something else entirely. and the fact that i'd never been able to beat it in previous attempts. not that it isn't strong or weak. i just played all the right moves and the computer played the wrong moves. It lost on 11... Qe8, shutting its king in so it had no escape. 

Its a weak computer.

FChopin99

Move 11 was genius.

FChopin99
FChopin99
GUYS I BEAT COMPUTER 4 IMPOSSIBLE!!
etc2000chess

Oh yes...

BirdBrain
chessfreak wrote:
tornado81 wrote:

Yeah it was Rad1. my mistake. but it doesn't really matter that much. Thank you bird :) chessfreak: my first two attempts at beating it, first of which only lasted 29 moves and my loss, second of which lasted 46 moves and another loss, says something else entirely. and the fact that i'd never been able to beat it in previous attempts. not that it isn't strong or weak. i just played all the right moves and the computer played the wrong moves. It lost on 11... Qe8, shutting its king in so it had no escape. 

Its a weak computer.

Dude, his rating is 1086.  This means he is improving.  Cut him some slack.  I guess when you beat a 2000, we can chalk it up to that he was having an off day, rather than you actually playing better than before?

BirdBrain

Tornado, you got some real trolls on your page man.  Good job, don't mind the goofballs.

didibrian
Yet, you don't know how to play the two knights
chessfreak

BirdBrain wrote:

Tornado, you got some real trolls on your page man.  Good job, don't mind the goofballs.

Im not trolling I thought he was saying it as if it was a strong engine he beat or something.

BirdBrain

chessfreak wrote:

BirdBrain wrote:

Tornado, you got some real trolls on your page man.  Good job, don't mind the goofballs.

Im not trolling I thought he was saying it as if it was a strong engine he beat or something.

For his rating, this is an accomplishment. I remember how proud I was to finally beat the 1000 ELO on CM8000.

tornado81
Trolls be atrollin'
FChopin99

"I am not a troll"

Richard Nixon