I hate playing as black

Imagine an International Master going through the online games of a 600 for free, in his spare time, where the player does not know things from the first hour of chess instruction, ie. the basics of tactics OR strategy, and asking for examples from that body of work. 

That is nonsense saying you use the Kings Indian more than the Sicilian.  The KI is a Queen's pawn opening, the Sicilian is a King's pawn open.  If those are the two openings you play as Black, which one you play on a game to game basis solely depends on White's first moves.

It would be like saying I play the French more than the Dutch, which again would be nonsense as it would depend on White's first moves each game.

I seem to be black all the time trying to learn new moves with white and get black five times in a row ,abort ,abort , waiting for the lock . I really think the computer should match it more fairly if you played white last time then you should be black next match .

I seem to get different results with different black openings. I made it to 1000 elo and then changed my black opening and took a dive. So I'm going back and trying to get things right.

Perhaps try changing things up and experiment until you find something that gives better results.

Sorry but those last posts are misleading in the OP's case. It's not about openings or colours when players consistently blunder, as advantage is always switching from one side to the other during the game. Post #15 is worth a read.

I believe learning the basics of openings and defenses can help.

This can help newer players discover helpful things, like the importance of development, center control, king safety, and so on.

Without such knowledge, a player will just try random things every game. Maybe ...f6 one game. Maybe ...a6 the next.

There will be very little logic to their opening moves, because they haven't bothered to learn the purpose of openings.

I discovered that after 300+ (rapid) games, my win rate is 53% with white and 63% with black. That comes as a surprise to me. It's a significant difference and I have no idea why I'm better with black. 

Maybe it's just blind luck. Or maybe it's because I'm an athlete, and playing black is more of a sport than playing white. There has to be an explanation. 

@skystalker1 that's not always possible though, because what if both players had black last time? One of them would have to get 2 in a row. But if you are playing a match against the same player then the colors will alternate from round to round.

you match them accordingly, it should be 50 -50 so should not be a problem ,I did not notice that a rematch does  it though good to know, although I don't often rematch as it's normally a much better player that seems to take over

Something else I did not know explains why I have been getting so much black ,normally I'm not that bothered, but trying to learn the London opening .

I get most wins as black..

I was not aware of that myth. My hypothesis is that playing white, I feel more pressure to attack and take advantage of the initiative, and consequently are somewhat more prone to errors....whereas with black, I am much more deliberate in light of knowing he has a half step of tempo going for him....hence more careful. It's just a hypothesis, manufactured to fit the data.....non-scientific.  Or maybe the openings I typically use with black are just better / more sound. With white, I almost always use the bishop's opening because it's familiar. With black, it's likely to be Kings Indian. With white, I run my opening and with black, I'm much more likely to be responding to his moves. If any of that makes sense. Bottom line, I have a significantly better record playing black, but can only guess wildly as to why. 

I don't really believe it's luck.

I gave up playing bots. It seemed to me that a 1000 level bot would play the same as a 1500 level, except would occasionally just give away a piece. It seemed very unrealistic to me.

That's strange, I love playing as black