Did you focus on slower games for improvement? was it like a 50/50 ratio of bullet and slow chess? When do you think lookig back would be the best methed for someone else and at what stage is it important to start studying theory and endgames, I focus tactics for me theory is pointless but whats your advice? and congrats thats amazing
I got 2200 in Bullet!
Did you focus on slower games for improvement? was it like a 50/50 ratio of bullet and slow chess? When do you think lookig back would be the best methed for someone else and at what stage is it important to start studying theory and endgames, I focus tactics for me theory is pointless but whats your advice? and congrats thats amazing
Well, i did focus on my rapid chess too, i got 2100+ in rapid, but on the other website
Everyone says that if u want to improve, you should do tactics, but i've been doing them for years and they did not really affect my rating. I do not train tactics and i do not study endgames or theories. i just check my games and analyze my mistakes.
yea ive felt that to on lichess im almost 2160 tactics and i also do just the randomones when your not logged n ill do 30 or 40 real fast and well lets just say my rsting isnt 2160 and i have never analyzed my games, do you watch any streams for improvement? ive been watch naroditskys speedrun but im not sure if im actually improving
yea ive felt that to on lichess im almost 2160 tactics and i also do just the randomones when your not logged n ill do 30 or 40 real fast and well lets just say my rsting isnt 2160 and i have never analyzed my games, do you watch any streams for improvement? ive been watch naroditskys speedrun but im not sure if im actually improving
I watch naroditsky, but to be honest when i watch too many streams and chess videos, i play worse, i think you need to be fresh and focused to play well.
They really need a separate rating for 30 second.
Dude i am 2200-2300 in 30 second bullet, but i am easily 2100-2200 in 1 minute bullet. why are you hating?
They really need a separate rating for 30 second.
Dude i am 2200-2300 in 30 second bullet, but i am easily 2100-2200 in 1 minute bullet. why are you hating?
I made that comment a year ago.
not hard to get 2200 in bullet here on this overinflated site
This dude wont reply to you for a whole year. Not a very good target for trolling.
They really need a separate rating for 30 second.
Dude i am 2200-2300 in 30 second bullet, but i am easily 2100-2200 in 1 minute bullet. why are you hating?
I made that comment a year ago.
I was not 2100-2200 in 1 min bullet then
not hard to get 2200 in bullet here on this overinflated site
This dude wont reply to you for a whole year. Not a very good target for trolling.
how am i a troll when my rating is higher than yours?
Haven't you heard? The bigger the rating, the bigger the troll.
They really need a separate rating for 30 second.
Dude i am 2200-2300 in 30 second bullet, but i am easily 2100-2200 in 1 minute bullet. why are you hating?
I made that comment a year ago.
I was not 2100-2200 in 1 min bullet then
That's some Count of Monte Cristo levels of resentment.
this is very good, I have 600 and I am very proud of it, once there were 10,000, I just destroyed rivals, I couldn't sleep properly, I dreamed of chess pieces and strategies in my head, the doctor advised me to play with my eyes closed, I began to play only better, then someone from my friends said to start with a 100 rating, here is a really hard game, this is not for you to beat Magnus))) Sorry for my English, good luck to everyone, 600 pts is a real hell
When i registered on chess.com(2015) i had rating of 900-1000 in bullet.
After countless games and many years, i managed to get 2000+ rating in bullet
I wonder how good is this rating and what is realistic next goal in my case?