I think this question is not the best in the chess personality test.

Sort:
Avatar of Fetoxo

This is the chess personality test:

https://www.chesspersonality.com/

This is one of the questions:

A 99% accuracy game is much rarer. I had like 1 which was longer than the opening, but I get a brilliant move pretty frequently. It should be like 2 brilliant moves in one game, because that almost matches the rarity of 99% accuracy games. 

Avatar of Fetoxo
Any opinions?
Avatar of MrChatty

No

Avatar of Fetoxo
@MrChatty saying "no" to the question "any opinions" is an opinion, so yes.
Avatar of MrChatty

So no is yes?

Avatar of Fetoxo
Technically, yes. But, this is like saying ∞÷1=∞ ∞÷2=∞ 1=2.
Avatar of Fr3nchToastCrunch

The test was also posted quite a bit of time after they massively dumbed down the requirements for a "brilliant" move, making this question even more black and white than it should be. I'm pretty sure I've never played a genuine brilliant move in my entire chess career, even though I supposedly have about 20 of them. I think it should be changed to "3 brilliant moves in one game."

Avatar of MrChatty
Fetoxo wrote:
Technically, yes

Ok

Avatar of Fetoxo
No, 3 brilliant moves in one game are rarer than 99% accuracy games.