as i say i have troubles with internet my real rating is around 1900 blitz
I want to be a fide master
Sort:
and that means that? online rating or something? I don't see where OP said he can beat FMs already. thats his goal and 1700 online player is better than the 1200s 1400s 1600s. case close.
May 1, 2018
0
#24
occz wrote:
as i say i have troubles with internet my real rating is around 1900 blitz
| Highest: | 1879 (Apr 23, 2018) |
|---|
May 1, 2018
0
#26
occz wrote:
as i say i have troubles with internet my real rating is around 1900 blitz
Again...an online rating means about as much as getting on of those online "Life Experience" degrees.
May 1, 2018
0
#27
occz wrote:
how much i have to train to reach 2300 elo? should i focus on tactics, strategy, openings or endgames? how many hours a day? should be nice if a fide master say his experience
If I am interpreting your stats correctly you have never played a single game under slow time controls. Since you make no mention of it, I assume that you have not played in any FIDE rated OTB tournament under classical time controls. I mean this constructively; you are not demonstrating any serious effort to even consider whether you have any interest in playing classical chess. Playing online blitz has very little relationship to classical FIDE rated OTB chess under classic time controls.
actually i have played under low time control long time ago and i got pretty good results the problem is that i live in a town that its too far away from chess tournaments so its dificult for me to do it, easier is to play onlone or train from my own
May 1, 2018
0
#29
occz wrote:
actually i have played under low time control long time ago and i got pretty good results the problem is that i live in a town that its too far away from chess tournaments so its dificult for me to do it, easier is to play onlone or train from my own
Thats to bad. Im very blessed. I live near a chess club, and cities where there are many tournaments.
im just telling the facts im around 1900 2000 elo strengh im just asking for advice how much i have to train and where i have to focus to reach around 2300
Yup, it's super easy. I didn't even play online chess. I just played some video games, and suddenly, the title magically appeared.
May 1, 2018
0
#32
occz wrote:
im just telling the facts im around 1900 2000 elo strengh im just asking for advice how much i have to train and where i have to focus to reach around 2300
"im just telling the facts im around 1900 2000 elo strengh"
1. How many FIDE tournments have you played in?
2. What is your FIDE card #?
3. What is your FIDE rating?
4. Can you post a tournament result?
May 1, 2018
0
#33
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
FishEyedFools wrote:
Again...an online rating means about as much as getting on of those online "Life Experience" degrees.
I got mine in Self-Exploration Seminaring (with a minor in Ultimate Frisbee).
I achieved my lowly chess standing (in good standing at that!) by performing the following:
Wishing really hard.
Upgrading my home interwebz.
Half a**ing my way through studying.
Forgetting more than i learned.
Being lazy.
When all of this failed to impress people. I went to the ultimate reply.
"My published rating is <insert rating here>, but my real strength is <insert rating here>" And when that got poo pooed. I busted out the big guns, and brought up my online rating, and tried convincing people that im actually better than even my online rating. Now...people wont speak to me. I think they're jealous of my skillz.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
May 1, 2018
0
#35
I have awards and stuff to backup my claim(s)
And i have a certificate on authentication to back these claims up.
BobbyTalparov wrote:
since i have memory i have never be 1400 i think
occz wrote:
In order to even start toward your objective, you must be objective about your current skills. Given that you were getting blow off the board by (online) 1400s as recently as March of this year, it would be highly unusual to improve by over 500 points of strength in the span of 2 months.
The first step towards your stated goal is to obtain an official OTB rating.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
BobbyTalparov wrote:
since i have memory i have never be 1400 i think
occz wrote:
In order to even start toward your objective, you must be objective about your current skills. Given that you were getting blow off the board by (online) 1400s as recently as March of this year, it would be highly unusual to improve by over 500 points of strength in the span of 2 months.
The first step towards your stated goal is to obtain an official OTB rating.
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
May 1, 2018
0
#38
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Hey FEF, do they also have an Award Certificate for losers? Or is that it?
I have multiple participation trophies/awards.
occz wrote:
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
No one is taking you seriously because you haven't done anything to show you're serious. You didn't even ask how to get better, you asked how to get a title. There are tons of training resources on this website alone, and you're not using any of them. All you are doing is playing speed chess. So all that we see is words. There are tons of people posting on here every day, wanting some quick fix to be good at chess, but all they do is play blitz and bullet.
chuddog wrote:
chuddog wrote: occz wrote: im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improveNo one is taking you seriously because you haven't done anything to show you're serious. You didn't even ask how to get better, you asked how to get a title. There are tons of training resources on this website alone, and you're not using any of them. All you arbe doing is playing speed chess. So all that we see is words. There are tons of people posting on here every day, wanting some quick fix to be good at chess, but all they do is play blitz and bullet.
actually i train and work to improve, yesterday i learned rook endgames philidor maneuver, lucena position, vancura position and french defense mcutcheon variation i also have watch the whole us championship with seirawan and friends comentaries i think i ve learned something from them
occz wrote:
im just a weak player with and an objetive who want advices to improve
No one is taking you seriously because you haven't done anything to show you're serious. You didn't even ask how to get better, you asked how to get a title. There are tons of training resources on this website alone, and you're not using any of them. All you are doing is playing speed chess. So all that we see is words. There are tons of people posting on here every day, wanting some quick fix to be good at chess, but all they do is play blitz and bullet.
To simplify. 1700 is expected to score 50% against a 1700 and 2300 will score ~97% against 1700.
97 is "almost double" 50.