I would not lose to bobby fischer if he was alive

Huh took me a while to see that nothing works against that opening trap. It's a nice one

Fischer would do the same as would Carlsen, Nakamura, etc.

They would deviate from theory in some rare, unresearched line and then beat the OP when he's reduced to actually having to think about moves himself.

Of course, if we took Peak Fischer out of time and gave him 6 months to train with today's Stockfish and a modern database, he'd go wild.

Also, I'm pretty sure Fischer would've spotted that ...e3 was a blunder, at a glance. He would've been calculating that Nd2-Qb3 intermezzo several moves back, before he even played e5-e4. You don't get to his level by just looking only a move or two ahead.

Still, some cool positions. Poor ol' Fischer never stood a chance!

Op said it would be 89 year old Fischer which gives him a fighting chance but I'll still take Fischer

Clarke's Third Law: Sufficiently advanced ragebait is indistinguishable from seriousness

it gives Fischer a fighting chance, because he's not 90 yet (but soon!)

this is clearly bait, what are you some kind of fisher?

what nonsense is this?

Bobby fischer if he stop playing chess from when he was at his prime until he's 89 years old(still alive and no brain injuries and such) vs a chess.com member who trained hard and uses stockfish as a research partner. Who will win?

is Bobby still alive?

No

Even if he were he had health issues that are impossible to compensate for in my opinion.