If you'd only learn a bit about how to read, you might notice that I'm not comparing myself with Einstein in the way you mean. He and I are very different people, thank Heavens.
Your reading comprehension is so poor that you think I took the same test dozens of times and yet you call other people deluded. You are, indeed, self-deluding because you believe as fact only that which you wish to and everything that doesn't fit, you bend to fit what you think suits you.
And you continue to believe that you are fit and capable to hold a conversation with me. If that isn't the ultimate self delusion, it's getting close.
For a change, perhaps you should learn to be nice to people. I have noticed two things. Anyone who is noticeably cleverer than you is likely to think differently from you. Yet you constantly try to poke fun at what they think, simply because you don't think it yourself. That's failure right across the board, isn't it? Take your medications and try to be nice.
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
    
Actually, although Einstein is widely regarded as pioneering the New Physics, he isn't and didn't. He was very much of the old school and he turned out to be a bit of a dinosaur, who couldn't adapt until he'd lost his reputation with the pioneers of the New Physics and they proceeded without him.
Then he tried to restore his reputation by doing an about turn. Incidentally, Einstein supported the idea of a Big Bang originating the universe. That was only widely accepted around 1970 or so. Personally, I accepted it in the forefront of the wave of believing in the Big Bang, around the mid 60s. I can remember arguing for it against complete scepticism. By 1970, I'd read a physics book which pretty much disproved it and I accepted the findings, which were backed by mathematics, logic and firm scientific principles. So I only accepted the Big Bang when I was a schoolboy and never since. It's wrong, end of story. And Einstein's belief in it propagated it. I suppose I have to admit that in a general sense, I'm cleverer than he was, with a higher IQ, if that means anything. So what? I'm not a mathematician. It just happened that I was extremely good at mental arithmetic and very fast and accurate use of logic, when I was about 9. It attracted a lot of attention at the time, among educationalists.
Of course, people don't tend to believe other people online and many people lack any ability to accurately judge mental ability in others, in any case. In fact, it's funny watching them, very often.
I personally always accept what people tell me about themselves unless they give me further evidence that they are mistaken or wrong. It's VERY easy to see whether people are telling the truth but ONLY if you're good at it.
Stop comparing yourself to Einstein, and go sort your marbles and WWII letters...you already blew your high IQ "cover" last go 'round, when you finally revealed that you self-administered all your IQ tests on your living room floor (having previously revealed and that you took the same tests dozens of times).
There are a few delusional posters on the forums, but you are truly the once and future king...