If You Could Change One Rule In Chess, What Would It Be?

Sort:
Avatar of Ziryab

I would change the tournament rules on this site. The default should require an established rating and an account that is more than a month old.

Newcomer tournaments should be offered as special cases, not the default.

Avatar of long_quach
Jessicamel wrote:
long_quach wrote:

@Jessicamel

You answer your own question first.

personally, I could eliminate en passant, eliminate touch move from slow games, make pawns only go one square on the first move, etc.

 

If oy had a buzzer so you could give your opponent electrical shocks, but only 3 shocks pr game

In Xiangqi, pawns only move 1 square at a time.

You can play Xiangqi and Operation simultaneously.

In Operation, if your tweezers touch the electrodes, you'll get zapped by a 9V battery.

Avatar of long_quach
tygxc wrote:

@1

Change the 3-fold repetition rule to whoever repeats a position loses, like Go or Stratego.

Iffy.

Who is repeating?

The chaser or the chased?

Avatar of long_quach
Ziadrizkalla wrote:

If I were to suggest changing one rule of chess, it would be to allow for a limited number of "resets" or "mulligans" during a game.

It exists. In sparring.

When I spar against the computer or a person, I allow 3 take backs in a game.

Avatar of long_quach
Zanyzephyr wrote:

Instead of picking one player ahead of time to be white and go first, have Player 1 make a move for white. Then, Player 2 gets to decide which color they want to play as.

This rule exists in Renju.

I'm wary of injecting genes from other games into chess.


My idea for chess.

Chess as a triathlon.

1 game of Western chess.

1 game Chinese chess.

1 game of Backgammon for a tie-breaker.

Flip a coin for Western chess. The one who moves 1st in one form of chess moves 2nd in the other form of chess.

Avatar of Letchworthshire
Cymbiotika wrote:

Fischer Ramdom chess would do that. For those not familiar, Fisher random or Chess960 was proposed by former World Champion Bobby Fischer and involves rearranging the starting positions of the pieces on the back rank, at random, each time, yielding 960 possible starting positions. With the proposal being to retain opposite colour bishops and castling.

There’s even better suggestions. For example:

Avatar of long_quach
Letchworthshire wrote:
 

There’s even better suggestions. For example:

People have tried chess with more pieces, bigger board, more combo pieces for centuries.

It has never took off. None of it ever surpassed Fide chess..


Xiangqi, Chinese chess is remarkable because it kept the same gene of having 16 pieces.

Per capita, Chinese chess is more popular than Fide chess.

Avatar of long_quach
Cymbiotika wrote:

Fischer Ramdom chess would do that.

Burmese chess exists. You can place the pieces anywhere behind the infantry.

This idea did not surpass the static starting position of Chess and Xiangqi.

Avatar of Reflection

I would change the rule about the castling. When your in check, you can still castle (but you still can’t if it’s a place you get mated)

Avatar of long_quach
lindabell4 wrote:

In real life your opponent can use the same weapons that you can use.
for example your enemy can use your own gun to kill YOU.
(its not password protected!!)

Isn't that in Shogi?

You can put captured soldiers back on the board?

The Shogi pieces are not colored. (It don't matter if you're black or white. - Michael Jackson).

Avatar of long_quach
Ziadrizkalla wrote:

#14

I’d abandon the “new” algebraic notation, and go back to the old descriptive notation.

“e4 e5” just isn’t as poetic as “P-K4 P-K4”.

And it’s harder to visualize what is going on.

You are English centric.

A - H is universal as they are Latin alphabet.

What about German, French, Spanish, Italian, etc.

Figurine algebraic is language-less. It goes back to the concept of Chinese glyph.

♘f3

Avatar of long_quach
Ziadrizkalla wrote:

#14

1. I’d abandon the “new” algebraic notation, and go back to the old descriptive notation.

“e4 e5” just isn’t as poetic as “P-K4 P-K4”.

2. And it’s harder to visualize what is going on.

1. Descriptive is intuitive.

But there are other considerations. Universality. North-South orientation.

2 sides having different names for the same spot is real.

The Battle of Bull Run to the North, the Battle of Manassas to the South.

Two sides having different names for the same spot is real.

The Battle of Bull Run to the North, the Battle of Manassas to the South.

2. That's why there are numbers and letters on the sides of the USCF vinyl boards.

Avatar of long_quach

@Seth_Isaac

Historically, any side can move first.

It is only in the last 200 years that fixes (not move, not not correct) White to move first.

@Jessicamel

Historically there is no "touch move" rule, until the "touch move" rule is established.

Historically, pawns only move 1 square, so no en passant.

@lindabell4

Historically there is no castling. Castling was invented.

@Ziadrizkalla

I have Logical Chess - Chernev in Descriptive and then Algebraic.


1 step pawns

no castling

exists in Xiangqi.


You cannot make a rule to un-make a rule.

It's kinda like "once you go black, you can't go back" kinda rule.

You guys are not observing the "once you go black" rule.

Avatar of long_quach
lindabell4 wrote:
  1. Removing castling would change how the game is played. The King is not as safe in the center of the board. 
     

Xiangqi.

The King is confined to a 3 x 3 area, like a goalie.

The elephants cannot cross the river, like the defenders in Lacrosse.

It's very viable.

Avatar of HernanCacciatore1

The end of the world as we know it? put a peanut at random and prohibit the entire troop from stopping at it -Sorry for spontaneously creating peanut chess right now.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
long_quach wrote:

@Jessicamel

You answer your own question first.

No they asking other people what they think

Why answer for them let the other people answer first if you just want to see opinions

Avatar of Jenium

I would make a rule that FIDE rated games must not start before 11 am local time.

Avatar of Ziryab
Jenium wrote:

I would make a rule that FIDE rated games must not start before 11 am local time.

I would make a rule that FIDE rated games must end by 9:00 pm local time. The chess world’s discrimination against morning people oppresses me.

Avatar of limboforever

Honestly, a rule that should be changed is checkmating the opponent. One reason is long range checkmating. It would be such a game changer if you could put a bishop in the corner of the boar and the king in the other and it counts as a checkmate!

That's all I have to say today! Bye!

Avatar of Cymbiotika

there is a rule according to which if a player refuses to shake hands before the match he is to be declared as loser...

i would like to change that rule