Im as good as Magnus Carlsen!

Sort:
1stPlaze
Jason_Keirn wrote:

Actually, that means you MAY/MAY NOT be as good as magnus carlsen, since "wether or not you played him in a tournament" plays a role in the question of "who is better"

I play/not play magnus carlsen + I beat him /i dont beat him = the question of supremacy

You have a point!

Kyobir

If you feel bad, remember that Hikaru lost to a 700 rated player

blueemu
Kyobir wrote:

If you feel bad, remember that Hikaru lost to a 700 rated player

Firouzja (peaked at 2804, the youngest 2800+ player in history) lost to a 1900 in a FIDE-rated tournament (not online, not blitz).

1stPlaze
Kyobir wrote:

If you feel bad, remember that Hikaru lost to a 700 rated player

lol

slither_master_koala
Mugiwara wrote:

then you're also as good as a 100 elo player because you've never played them

I was really 100 before and I win other 100 so I’m better then 100 lol

1stPlaze

lol