I’m confused? Are tactics or endgames more important?

if you learn endgames your middlegame and opening play will also improve because you will understand the importance of pawn structures, strong and weak squares, and piece activity

nope

Yeah, that's a silly statement.

Endgame knowledge constantly informs your strategic decisions in the middlegame.

They both are as important as each other, work on both and you will improve.

yo, what did you do here

you again

It depends. If you are a positional player, endgames. If you are a tactical player, tactics. That's what I think at least.

Also, both are important anyway. I personally prefer tactics.

Have you ever heard of "grammar"? Also I never insulted you, you could have just ignored what I said and nothing special would have happened.

LMAO

Is it any relation to grammar?

lol

Nothing is preventing both from being true. They are not contradictory. Even if you all you needed are these tactics to reach a certain level, that wouldn't mean it is the only way, or necessarily the best way. It can also be true that observing the game in reverse, starting from the endgame with fewer pieces and expanding the concepts until you reach the opening where more is out there is a helpful model to utilize. 

You could even argue the ideas are mergeable, prioritizing tactics as #1, but then endgame is ranked higher than the others. I'd imagine when stronger players say "all you need it tactics" they take it as a give you know the basics. After all, you'd need to know how the pieces moves, we all agree on that. And surely an endgame like king + queen vs king is pretty basic? The stronger players may also have a larger list of things they call basic, so some of the things you might not have assumed were basic at your level might be considered basic to them. 

I doubt we could generalize to say one claim is going to work out better for you than another. They each highlight different truths about the game, and a brief comment is not going to cover everything to learn about a game this complex. Determining what needs the most study for one specific player probably would require knowledge of their games, strengths, weaknesses, etc. And even if you chose the "worse" option, improving in that area is still going to result in you improving. 

lol

Look at your last few losses. Did you lose because of the opening, the tactics, or the endgame?

Whatever caused the loss, study that.

almost 90% of games, especially at the beginner level never reach the endgame (unless you're one of those people who trades everything) But I also don't really suggest learning tactics, but moreso opening tactics, as these help you figure out how to set up tactics, rather than puzzles that help you find tactics that are already set up.

Not true!  Both are equally vital.  If you do not know what do do with 8 pieces on the board, how are you going to handle 32?

Asking whether Tactics or Endgames are more important is like asking whether your brain or heart is a more vital organ?  Either fails, you die!  You suck at tactics or endgames, you die!

My last few games have either been missing tactics and losing in drawn or even endgames that I was better

*grammar

like it matters lol but ok