I’m confused? Are tactics or endgames more important?

Then why...? Lol

You posted on a public forum.

Try to know your strengths and weakness. Try to improve the ones you have success for. It depends. For example, if you study opening and you won 2 consecutive; study middlegame and you won 3 consecutive; and you study endgame and you won 4 consecutive. It only means that you should prioritize studying endgames because you have better results.

both are important lol, bad tactics lead to bad endgames, which make you lose, but bad end games will end the whole game bruh :)))

yup but you must focus first on the one you have more profits. We have limited resources, that is why we have to think like a capitalist.

I think my endgame is much worse. Recently I’ve been losing and drawing winning endgames

I'd argue the opposite: you should focus on the area where you're struggling the most.

Identify your weaknesses. Turn them into strengths. Rinse and repeat.

Eventually you will have no weaknesses.

Both

I understand your point but it all depends on what really makes the profit. Based on what i learned from theory of evolution, successful species are not those who surpass their weakness and became jack of all trades but those who honed themselves based on what the environment dictates. Look at how duck went, it can fly a little, can float/swim in the pond, and can walk in land but it is hunted down by predators. It really depends on who you are and take advantage of what you've got. There is also a lesson on 48 laws of power which says that we should not be jack of all trades. I dont understand it before, but now I know that all of us are different and there is no one who can do all things in a perfect way. It is because we have limited resources.

First of all, i'm a boy. If you can't tell my gender, then idk what you can do. And yes, lots of people use commas in their sentences, but ofc you wouldn't know that, since you keep trolling on the forums like a random idiot.

Say's the guy who wastes his time on cc trolling people like he/she has nothing else to do. There's a reason I have you blocked.

ikr

Oh I also read up to the 1800 section in silmans book

poor rico his thread turning into chaos

I get what you're saying. However, you seem to be equating Darwinism (or economics) with chess ... but they're not the same.

Chess is more akin to a sport, a craft, or an art, in regards to improvement. The more you work on a specific aspect of it, the better you get at it.

A duck can't do much to improve its defenses against predators. It's at the slow mercy of evolution.

A chess player, however, can do a lot to improve his or her weaknesses. One's skills and talents, in chess, aren't fixed - they're fluid.

Also, if your opponent decides that you are weak at tactics but strong at strategy and endgames, he will deliberately head for complicated, tactical positions. Conversely, if endgames are your Achilles Heel, your opponent will start trading off pieces and bleeding the dynamicism out of the position.

Nature doesn't deliberately aim at your weakness. Chess opponents do.

Good points. I've been on the receiving end of those very strategies many times.

both are important 

"Stupid anime girl"

this is just top-level comedy lmao

I suggest you get some popcorn while watching the show