You must try easy tactics only. Like puzzle rush. Chess.com lets you to climb on 2000 elo tactics but you are weak at simple 1600 blunder situations
I'm convinced now - studying too many tactics makes me worse

club of numbers can help... member nightwish has some links for people to trade blog views... also i have every achievement so compare your list with mine to find every hidden one.

Take a single tactic, try and see the whole puzzle before you move. If you just move the piece and look for the next move, it's not really strengthening your thought process.

Tactics alone will bring you to rated 2000 is a myth. Sorry seven circles and woodpecker fans.
Nice.

Just some food for thought for you players who seem to be stuck in the low 1200s but are doing a lot of tactics that doesn't seem to help your rating.
I still don't understand studying tactics because you know that there's a tactic available. In a real game you know one is always available but 90% of the time they won't work and it's getting a position where they will work that's important. Also playing bullet and blitz all the time will be very bad for your chess if you're a beginner. To benefit from them you already need to be fairly strong.

Just some food for thought for you players who seem to be stuck in the low 1200s but are doing a lot of tactics that doesn't seem to help your rating.
I still don't understand studying tactics because you know that there's a tactic available. In a real game you know one is always available but 90% of the time they won't work and it's getting a position where they will work that's important. Also playing bullet and blitz all the time will be very bad for your chess if you're a beginner. To benefit from them you already need to be fairly strong.
Arguing with a guy who already left chess.com is wise. You will always win the argument.
Even if he somehow comes back, he certainly won't remember what he wrote 8 years ago, so that's also good.
Good job, keep it up!
advertising is not allowed.