Is 1100 considered a respectable and above average rating?

Sort:
Avatar of BaphometsChess
Maybe
Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame
Kyobir wrote:

1100 is good

Thanks

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:

1100 ?????????? NO

sorry, under no circumstances is 1100 considered respectable in Chess

it is well below average

It's above average in chesscom maybe not in otb tho lol

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

@Prince_Skywalker i started at 800

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

now i am 1171

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

I told you i started at 800

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

That was very rude

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I told you i started at 800

that's horrible

It's bad but not as bad as you think

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

now i am 1171

that's not something to be proud of. sorry for the reality check

Sorry for the reality check neither is being 2200 sometimes

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

I am not very proud of it but it is not bad it is above average

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I am not very proud of it but it is not bad it is above average

It's worse than you think but better than casual players lol

Casualy your fine ,competitively unless it's a local tournament i think it's below average if I remember correctly

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I told you i started at 800

that's horrible

It's bad but not as bad as you think

It's really bad

when i think of a 1100 level player I think of someone who can not write or speak intelligibly let alone move 8 pieces on a chess board in coordinated movements

Now that's disrespectful maybe you should just be nice and help them get better with chess instead of being mean

Chess does NOT equal intelligence

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Prince skywalker now you would say 1000s dont know how pieces move and 800s have seen chess pieces

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I am not very proud of it but it is not bad it is above average

It's worse than you think but better than casual players lol

Casualy your fine ,competitively unless it's a local tournament i think it's below average if I remember correctly

it's so bad that it borders on the line of why am i playing chess if im only going to be rated 1100

Here's your answer for fun ! You do not have to be good at everything you like

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Thank you bigchessplayer665

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I told you i started at 800

that's horrible

It's bad but not as bad as you think

It's really bad

when i think of a 1100 level player I think of someone who can not write or speak intelligibly let alone move 8 pieces on a chess board in coordinated movements

Now that's disrespectful maybe you should just be nice and help them get better with chess instead of being mean

Chess does NOT equal intelligence

perhaps to you

chess does equal intelligence based on my experience. most people who dont know how to play chess well are blithering fools

If you play chess to keep your ego up by going "your smarter than everyone else " well I have nothing to say

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I am not very proud of it but it is not bad it is above average

It's worse than you think but better than casual players lol

Casualy your fine ,competitively unless it's a local tournament i think it's below average if I remember correctly

it's so bad that it borders on the line of why am i playing chess if im only going to be rated 1100

Here's your answer for fun ! You do not have to be good at everything you like

oh goodness

keep telling yourself that

how do you think players get really good at chess by telling themselves that as long as youre having fun its okay to be horrible at chess? good grief

It is ok to bad at something as long as it's just casual for a hobby what you think chess can't be a hobby 😂😂😂

You HAVE to start somewhere nobody gets to 2000 instantly that usually means around 400-800

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I posted this forum as i am in 9th standard and want to take a break from chess after finishing my games maybe for a few months.I started from 800 reached 1171 so just asked is it respectable?I never said it is expert and I am advanced.Did not expect so rude answers...

who is being rude?

if you don't want to be told the truth then dont ask chess players to feel sorry for you when they tell you that 1100 is not a respectable level of chess when chess.com literally starts some at 1200

Maybe your version of the truth even if it isn't the actual truth

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

And hello i scored 98.7 percent in 8th standard india which is much better than you stupid usa study system.So big chess player was absolutely correct.Chess is not equal to intelligence

Even hikaru said "just cause you play chess doesn't make you a genius " and even hikarus pretty hotheaded when it comes to chess

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

absolutely that guy is just too egotic.If he wanted to say that in his viewpoint its bad he could have just said for me its not very good.What was the need to write things like its terrible,i have a 5 year old neighbour better than you,chess is equal to intelligence etc.?