Caffeineed wrote:
"Is being able to deadlift 950 pounds good"
"Is winning 7 Super Bowls good?"
"Is being the best tennis player in the world good?"
come on
it's an honest question 
is 1600 rating good?
Sort:
Mar 17, 2022
0
#23
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good.
2351.
Mar 17, 2022
0
#25
You could say it's pretty good, but also a pretty ordinary flex.
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
Careful. If you lose one game from your current 1707 rating...
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
people below this rating shouldnt have human rights , they need to be put in jail. They're a threat to society 
Mar 18, 2022
0
#28
HopsnLops wrote:
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
people below this rating shouldnt have human rights , they need to be put in jail. They're a threat to society
Self incrimination huh 😐
Mar 18, 2022
0
#29
protocolpawns wrote:
blueemu wrote:
protocolpawns wrote:
blueemu wrote:
Good for what?
for making pasta
1600 is an excellent pasta rating.
u lied to me i tried making pasta and failed miserably
You don’t know until you try the taste. It is an excellent taste, but you just didn’t take it delicious.
Mar 18, 2022
0
#30
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
You are just happy for having that rate. What about if I said 1600 or higher is good, but only the number 1707 rapid is not good?
1600 is okay if reached without cheating. Cheaters can get easily 2400 beforehand they get caught.
Mar 18, 2022
0
#33
B1ZMARK wrote:
Only the smart cheaters.
They think they are smart that when they cheat, but …they are actually stupid
Mar 18, 2022
0
#34
ShadowCellen wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
Only the smart cheaters.
They think they are smart that when they cheat, but …they are actually stupid
They’re only stupid because you don’t like them. But that doesn’t make them stupid.
Mar 18, 2022
0
#35
B1ZMARK wrote:
ShadowCellen wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
Only the smart cheaters.
They think they are smart that when they cheat, but …they are actually stupid
They’re only stupid because you don’t like them. But that doesn’t make them stupid.
I never said I didn’t like them…..Actually what I love about them that I feel like I am playing with a strong person… also I feel like “yay I can report this guy!”
A Cheater is not necessary stupid, he is just doing something very stupid. There is a big difference…., or wait, perhaps not?
#26 Well if I drop below that the standard will change. My truth is relative 😉
#27 indeed
that's a fancy way to put it . anyways want some pasta?