is 2200 a good rating?

I'm worried chess.com will ban me because I saw my game is more than 90% in my last win.

21 moves

no i don't think it's a very good rating because @Troll told me that my otb rating would be 700 if my online rating is 1700. so i think otb is online - 1000 points, putting you at 1200 i.e. class E player

I don't think that's true... I think 2200 is the same as master

But I'm guessing chess.com wont give me the master title on this account because I never played in FIDE

OwO

i was gonna make your life difficult for taking me seriously but........i must shamefully admit i fell for it too the first time. also you don't have nearly enough games to tell your online rating

thumbs down for the quote lol

pizza noooooo

please don't report me

ok

oh my goodness what are these @squid vibes

wait is he the same as the wacky pizza man they were talking about? Or are there a lot of pizza accounts?

"good" is always relative, for me, it would be whatever is 200 Elo above what you are already at

Pretty good considering you're trying new openings... gurgenidze as black and 1.Nf3 as white.

I always thought you were a spanish player with both colours.

Now now, let's not pay too much attention.

But yes, I had to play myself into shape so to speak. The big difference really was simply speed... when it's new you get behind on the clock easily.

In the words of Ben Finegold, "terrible, just terrible"

2200 is pretty good for most players. It's definitely worth a tip of the hat.

But if you want a more tough-love perspective on it, in the words of Hikaru Nakamura from his Disrespect Speedrun: "If you're not 2300, I mean ... I don't know what you're doing wrong."

@ehm42 it's natural when you are the 5th best in the world!