yeah this site is a joke, 2000 blitz players here hang pieces like crazy
that reminds me of this game i played last night, its relative and quite confusing at any level
just free pawns instead of pieces everywhere
AYO IS THAT THE PP PAWN STRUCTURE!?!?!?
i actually smile at this cause it's quite funny once you realize
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Maybe my cutoff of 2400 is a little low? Maybe? But I'd be surprised if most over 2500 blitz aren't master level OTB.
Obviously not everyone has the opportunity or desire to play OTB... some people would have to travel etc, but if given the opportunity I'd guess most would be able to.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Sure, 13 is really young, it's possible.
As Pfren would tell people, you need systematic study.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Sure, 13 is really young, it's possible.
As Pfren would tell people, you need systematic study.
What is systematic study?
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Sure, 13 is really young, it's possible.
As Pfren would tell people, you need systematic study.
What is systematic study?
It means going from one thing to the next without leaving anything out.
For example your 4 main categories might be: endgames, openings, tactics, strategy.
Then under endgames you could break it down further into...
Rook endgames, opposite color bishop endgames, same color bishop endgames, queen endgames...
And then each of those into 3 categories: pawnless endgames, pawns on one side, pawns on both sides.
Just as an example.
You'd do this via books and/or coach and/or analyzing tons of GM games.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included
guys i also have question, is 1488 is a good rating? considering the fact that i got it from 3 years of intense playing on this site.
...............
You registered 2 days ago?
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included
And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.
its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Sure, 13 is really young, it's possible.
As Pfren would tell people, you need systematic study.
What is systematic study?
It means going from one thing to the next without leaving anything out.
For example your 4 main categories might be: endgames, openings, tactics, strategy.
Then under endgames you could break it down further into...
Rook endgames, opposite color bishop endgames, same color bishop endgames, queen endgames...
And then each of those into 3 categories: pawnless endgames, pawns on one side, pawns on both sides.
Just as an example.
You'd do this via books and/or coach and/or analyzing tons of GM games.
Sounds like a ton of study.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included
And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.
its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher
Oh you said "most" ok, I mean, I disagree but I'll delete my comment about the 1 GM.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
Im 13 years old and i hope i can be a GM.
Sure, 13 is really young, it's possible.
As Pfren would tell people, you need systematic study.
What is systematic study?
It means going from one thing to the next without leaving anything out.
For example your 4 main categories might be: endgames, openings, tactics, strategy.
Then under endgames you could break it down further into...
Rook endgames, opposite color bishop endgames, same color bishop endgames, queen endgames...
And then each of those into 3 categories: pawnless endgames, pawns on one side, pawns on both sides.
Just as an example.
You'd do this via books and/or coach and/or analyzing tons of GM games.
Sounds like a ton of study.
Yeah, lots of studying and lots of playing. That's what your GM opponents will have done, so to score 50% against them you have to do it too.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way
I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.
You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.
no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included
And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.
its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher
Oh you said "most" ok, I mean, I disagree but I'll delete my comment about the 1 GM.
that is the most insignificant thing i have heard, you can disagree but at least don't delete
there have been rare cases with untitled players at 2700 like masters being 2100 or super low
no i don't think it's a very good rating because @Troll told me that my otb rating would be 700 if my online rating is 1700. so i think otb is online - 1000 points, putting you at 1200 i.e. class E player
there isn't 700 on fide
there have been rare cases with untitled players at 2700 same as masters being 2100 or super low
there is a 1300 WGM playing the caro kann.
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way