is 2200 a good rating?

Sort:
HenryUrbanek
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Kowarenai написал:

there have been rare cases with untitled players at 2700 same as masters being 2100 or super low

there is a 1300 WGM playing the caro kann.

SHUT UP ABOUT THE CARO-KANN I DESTROYED YOU WITH IT YESTERDAY. anyway, my goal is to become expert or CM or NM, and I think 2200 is a great rating, online and OTB.

I am 12 years old.

Stuckfish
TheAleop wrote:

guys i also have question, is 1488 is a good rating? considering the fact that i got it from 3 years of intense playing on this site.

It's definitely good, in the sense that it's higher than most people on the site and higher than most casual chess players will ever get to. You'll always look good playing casual chess when the opportunity comes up during life, and a lot of people will be very impressed.

If you're asking about future prospects e.g. whether a title is on the horizon for you someday... Honestly, probably not?

3 years of playing "intensely" as an adult to reach 1500 implies that you might have quite a tough journey if you would like to continue to improve further- yes it's better than most people can manage, but it's also quite a bit slower than your typical talented adult, and you'd be coming up against lots of those people in tournaments.

If you're 16 and played since you were 13 and very low Elo, it means you have a lot of time ahead of you and a neuroplastic brain, so with more efficient study you could still do quite well. On the other hand, it also means that your progress was even slower compared to most of the talented teens.

I'd say, be proud of your near-1500, and aim high! But just don't have GM on your bucket list or you'll end up disappointed because it's not realistic. It's not on my bucket list either.

Badchesserrr4486999
HenryUrbanek написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Kowarenai написал:

there have been rare cases with untitled players at 2700 same as masters being 2100 or super low

there is a 1300 WGM playing the caro kann.

SHUT UP ABOUT THE CARO-KANN I DESTROYED YOU WITH IT YESTERDAY. anyway, my goal is to become expert or CM or NM, and I think 2200 is a great rating, online and OTB.

I am 12 years old.

BRO THAT IS LEGIT WHY I HATE THE CARO KANN.

HenryUrbanek

BECAUSE YOU GET DESTROYED BY IT???

Badchesserrr4486999

Also how the hell are you soo talented?

Badchesserrr4486999
HenryUrbanek написал:

BECAUSE YOU GET DESTROYED BY IT???

YES DUMMY!

HenryUrbanek

oh darn it I pressed caps lock by accident again

HenryUrbanek

do you play the nimzo Larsen attack all the time as white? I play it when tilted

Unicorn_Horn12
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:

23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.

I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.

thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way

I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.

You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.

no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included

And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.

its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher

Oh you said "most" ok, I mean, I disagree but I'll delete my comment about the 1 GM.

that is the most insignificant thing i have heard, you can disagree but at least don't delete

Uh, I think you don't understand me...

Kowarenai
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:

23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.

I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.

thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way

I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.

You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.

no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included

And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.

its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher

Oh you said "most" ok, I mean, I disagree but I'll delete my comment about the 1 GM.

that is the most insignificant thing i have heard, you can disagree but at least don't delete

Uh, I think you don't understand me...

i do but what I am telling you is why delete something you were trying to prove?

Badchesserrr4486999
HenryUrbanek написал:

do you play the nimzo Larsen attack all the time as white? I play it when tilted

Its my mainstream opening.

Badchesserrr4486999

Currently trying to experiment with e4.

HenryUrbanek

The..........................................solid 1. b3

Badchesserrr4486999
HenryUrbanek написал:

The..........................................solid 1. b3

Yeah actually its great.

HenryUrbanek

sure it is

HenryUrbanek

just play d4 or e4

Badchesserrr4486999
HenryUrbanek написал:

just play d4 or e4

........

HenryUrbanek

best by test: 1. e4

Unicorn_Horn12
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
Unicorn_Horn12 wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:

23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.

I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.

thats cause they don't care about online or were peaked but age kept getting in the way

I'm just saying... most people above ~2400 blitz are good enough for a master title... the main exception being kids who get a boost in rating due to (my guess is) processing speed.

You said 2300-2600 aren't good enough to be master, but I'm saying what you really mean is you're 2500 and not good enough.

no you heard what i said most 2300-2600 players aren't good enough myself included

And you heard what I said... on the first page of your game history there's a 2400 blitz GM so... your statement is obviously very wrong.

its not wrong that GM is retired and peaked higher

Oh you said "most" ok, I mean, I disagree but I'll delete my comment about the 1 GM.

that is the most insignificant thing i have heard, you can disagree but at least don't delete

Uh, I think you don't understand me...

i do but what I am telling you is why delete something you were trying to prove?

I retracted the argument because I misread your post... which I already explained...

HenryUrbanek

are you talking to me or what why did you repeat it