Is 500 elo Good?

Sort:
Avatar of Ziryab
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
idkhow-to-mate wrote:

So 500 elo is not good is it? LMAO

No but 500 is "beat most of your friends and family level "

That’s probably true.

Avatar of Dill-Pickle-Q

bad, but better than people who just know the rules.

Avatar of RyanShed

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/is-500-elo-good#comment-108970667

Understand, though I am rated 500 and definitely in like the 1200 section on this sheet. I think the ratings are slightly deflated at lower levels

Avatar of chesssblackbelt
Ziryab wrote:

Here’s the most accurate guide to ratings that I’ve seen.

This is accurate for OTB ratings except for 2200 being "almost master"

It is NM or CM

Avatar of Ziryab
chesssblackbelt wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

Here’s the most accurate guide to ratings that I’ve seen.

This is accurate for OTB ratings except for 2200 being "almost master"

It is NM or CM

CM is not a master. NM is absent from the chart. As I said, it was the most accurate I’ve seen. I didn’t say it was perfect. I’ve seen a lot of similar charts that are garbage.

Avatar of Ziryab
ChillByteFire wrote:

But every good player was once a 500 elo, so keep playing

Was everyone once 500? Really?

Was Morphy? Capablanca?

Avatar of chesssblackbelt
Ziryab wrote:
chesssblackbelt wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

Here’s the most accurate guide to ratings that I’ve seen.

This is accurate for OTB ratings except for 2200 being "almost master"

It is NM or CM

CM is not a master. NM is absent from the chart. As I said, it was the most accurate I’ve seen. I didn’t say it was perfect. I’ve seen a lot of similar charts that are garbage.

wym CM is not a master? CM is better than NM

Avatar of chesssblackbelt

and yea morphy and capablanca were probably 500 rated strength at some point

Avatar of dragonroar400
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
idkhow-to-mate wrote:

So 500 elo is not good is it? LMAO

No but 500 is "beat most of your friends and family level "

That’s probably true.

not enought to beat my dad lol. hes a 1200 rated player but i beat him sometimes even tho my elo is like 750 i think

Avatar of Weirdaustrian
dragonroar400 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
idkhow-to-mate wrote:

So 500 elo is not good is it? LMAO

No but 500 is "beat most of your friends and family level "

That’s probably true.

not enought to beat my dad lol. hes a 1200 rated player but i beat him sometimes even tho my elo is like 750 i think

Dad's are like eternal 1200s imo, my dad also plays around that strength

Avatar of chesssblackbelt

my dad is probably 200 if i'm guessing

Avatar of Weirdaustrian
chesssblackbelt wrote:

my dad is probably 200 if i'm guessing

Whats Winrate against him? 99.999%?

Avatar of chesssblackbelt

i only play him if i wanna show off by playing blindfold but even blindfold i'd never lose lol

Avatar of dragonroar400
fyemoreau wrote:

good luck everyone

didnt u say that in another forum?

Avatar of dragonroar400
chesssblackbelt wrote:

i only play him if i wanna show off by playing blindfold but even blindfold i'd never lose lol

i play him like evry week(i won 2 times in a row last 2 weeks!)

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

Good is relative

Avatar of dragonroar400

wdym

Avatar of Rogue_King

Good and bad are relative. So yes and no.

Avatar of dragonroar400

i used to play blitz and i was like 500 and i could beat 1000 bots easily and i still can. the bots are too easy for some reason

Avatar of dragonroar400

1000 elo bots i mean