Is 700 a good rapid rating for a 13 year old(me)?

Sort:
Avatar of I_make_mistakes_16

Is 700 a good rapid rating for me?

Avatar of IMKeto

There is no "good" or "standard" rating for a certain age. 

Avatar of Brainless_Bill

No. sorry bro you gotta hit the brain gym, try lifting books with your eyes it will improve your brainpower and let you see the future after you do it enough times.

Avatar of Rancid-Knight

Nah not really. My first official otb rating was around 1600 uscf. It dropped to 1400 something, then surged again years later.

Avatar of FMLarry
IMBacon wrote:

There is no "good" or "standard" rating for a certain age. 

Agreed.

 

As an 11-year-old my rapid is above average, but that doesn't mean I'm good. There are always people higher and lower-rated than you. Just work at your own pace.

Avatar of Vinumonz555
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:

Is 700 a good rapid rating for me?

I was 400 elo when I was 14 years old. Now I'm 16 and i have a 1900 elo.

Avatar of FMLarry
Vinumonz555 wrote:
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:

Is 700 a good rapid rating for me?

I was 400 elo when I was 14 years old. Now I'm 16 and i have a 1900 elo.

Nice

Avatar of I_make_mistakes_16

Ok thanks for all your opinions 

Avatar of I_make_mistakes_16

If anyone wants to do a match with me I am available at 11:45 am IST 13th July 

Avatar of I_make_mistakes_16

But I have made a 350 point comeback in under 2 months

Avatar of tygxc

It is all relative, we now have 12 year old grandmasters.
700 offers a lot of potential for improvement. Try not to blunder. Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it.

Avatar of IsraeliGal

it depends how new you are to chess.

because you're a casual, you can't apply GM standards to yourself, so if you're new to chess, don't worry, 700 isn't that bad. ur only a couple hundred points off from where most people are, on this site anyway. 

just keep playing.

 

 

Avatar of ShavendraDeRafayal

I'm 11 and my rating Is 1100

Avatar of ShavendraDeRafayal

12

Avatar of Laskersnephew

If you're a 13 year old who has played in several tournaments and had private coaching, 700 would be a disappointing rating. If you have recently started to take chess a little seriously and play on Chess,com, 700 is fine! You have to start somewhere. 

Avatar of brasileirosim
I_make_mistakes_16 wrote:

Is 700 a good rapid rating for me?

Magnus Carlsen got a GM at this age, so I will say 700 is not that great. However, everybody has to begin with a low rating. I would say that you should get 1200 in rapid with proper training within one year. This means: learn a lot of tactics (purchase the book “ Common Chess Patterns “ in Chessable, with 780 useful tactics), analyse your games and begin to learn a basic opening repertoire.

Avatar of Andrewtopia

Generally, it depends on how much you play. If you are, like Hikaru put it, "psycho" about chess, 700 isn't that great. On the other hand, if you are a more balanced person in your life, 700 is respectable enough.

Avatar of Laskersnephew

Well, your age is much less relevant than how long you've been playing at least "semi-seriously." 

Avatar of Chess_masters_LA

I am 10 yrs old and my rapid rating is 1500. and i started chess a year ago only

Avatar of DCthedestroyer

I am rated 1400 and I am 10