Is Carlsen good-looking?

Great video President Max...

She is also breaking FIDE' dress code for female players in high-level events (intended to keep them from distracting opponents - which is already banned by the Laws of Chess).

Here is the full regulation.  Note the words I have emboldened.

3d The following is NOT acceptable for women players

Beach-wear slips, profanity and nude or semi-nude pictures printed on shirts, torn pants or jeans. holes, noticeable unclean clothing, sun glasses, sport caps. Revealing attire. Clothes such as denim shorts, short-shorts, cut-off shorts, gym shorts, crop tops, tank tops, and clothes made of see-through materials or clothes that expose areas of the body usually covered in the location where the event is taking place.

There is trolling, which can be entertaining, and there is plain nastiness.  

Now we know all we need to know about :

"EduardGlinkin"

As I said, some people fail to be amusing, and are just plain nasty and unpleasant. Thank you for proving my point.

Carlsen looks in real not as bad as in some photos. But still not my type... although success makes sexy... nah, still not my type.

Look dosent matters what matters is the success which he acheived...... still as per your question he looks fine..... but what matters in front of the fact that he is a world champion

I don't think you are looking at her face...

Anna Sharevich should have gotten kicked

Ha anche tratti psicologici autistici (narcisismo, egocentrismo, ecc...) e tratti somatici correllati con lo spettro autistico, proprio come Carlsen.

I do find him very attractive, but not for his fame 😊😊

i think shes good looking and boy can she play chess!

He's a chad lite

Giri is da wae

what cha thinking about #111   post some photos im bored by carlsen

If a woman volunteers an opinion as to whether a man is attractive or not, it doesn't matter what that opinion is: she finds him attractive.

It is hard to answer this question without being rude. 
So first of all it has to be said: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. 

After making it clear. I try to analyze how I personally perceive his facial structures. 

There is a facial imbalance in his facial third. While the midface is way too short, the chin is rather long. It kind of reminds me of Tom in Tom and Jerry when he gets deformity due to some violence. 

Let me explain this effect a little bit more, before being called rude myself. His cheeks are turnt inwards, while he browridge is projected outwards. It gives him this "neanthertal" look that everyone was talking about. The lack of forward growth  in his cheek area really throws one off because it isn't average in proportions.

Another point that is really inportant for his facial aesthetics is his jaw. While being large and massive, it lacks the angles and bone structures as say someone like the superman actor Henry Cavil. It isn't sharp nor contured. It has a roundness to it, which is not a good trait for men. 

The second most important thing is the eye area. From a direct consequence of his sloping forehead. His eye are hooded weirdly. The eye itself is to narrow while shaped round. It is out of proportions, while not being "manly" enough". It has also a slight negative tilt. 

Eyelid exposure is really good though on him. 

Ergo: It is mostly his bonestructure which let him deviate from the conventional beauty. The inward outward thing could be uncanny. Yet he can still be considered unconventionally attractive. His polarizing look could explain his modeling. 

I find him average. Not super hot, not ugly.

1. Everyone on that list is famous. IF any of those men were less famous or some random nobodies then they would not be on that list.

2. I think we already know the answer of this question. In my opinion women tend to find successful men more attractive than failed men.  A man's SMV(sexual marketplace value) is directly tied to how much money he makes or how famous / influential he is.  This is not true for women.

3. I don't think carlsen looks like a boxer