Suggo:Im going to try one more time and if you still don't agree then we really should be friends because i do enjoy a good debate.
From Websters New Collegiate Dictionary 1974
Projectile n 1.a body projected by an external force and continuing in motion by it's own ineria esp: a missile fired from a weapon (as a firearm) 2: a sefl-propelling weapon (as a rocket)
now how does punching someone not make the fist a projectile? "the body projected" is the fist the "eternal force" is the human body, and it continues by it's own inertia until the human body makes it stop. like i said if you still don't agree maybe we should talk politicis and not agree on anything there either.
I really don't understand the need that some have to validate an activity by requiring it to be a sport. It seems that there is a notion that sports are superior to games and in order for chess to be a worthwhile pursuit we have to include it in this "superior" category. The fact is that there is no qualitative difference between the two categories -- each has it's own unique set of merits and neither is superior to the other. Also in claiming chess as sport, you do a disservice to both the game of chess, which stands both as the game of kings and the king of games, and to the English language which suddenly has little use for the distinction between sport and game once this miscategorization is adopted.