Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
It is by definition privilege.
A narrowly applied correction to a systemic issue of privilege is not itself privilege. It's a correction of applied privilege.
So you are saying all men have privilege over all women?
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
It is by definition privilege.
A narrowly applied correction to a systemic issue of privilege is not itself privilege. It's a correction of applied privilege.
So you are saying all men have privilege over all women?
"Systemic issue" does not imply a 100% absolute. I would say "nice try" again, but not so much...
Damn, I was about to claim it!
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
It is by definition privilege.
A narrowly applied correction to a systemic issue of privilege is not itself privilege. It's a correction of applied privilege.
So you are saying all men have privilege over all women?
"Systemic issue" does not imply a 100% absolute. I would say "nice try" again, but not so much...
So why should women who have advance over some men be given privilege because a small elite group of men have privilege?
The systematic thing you see includes wealth, so is not sexist at the root. Wealth is a much greater privilege than sex.
Can’t tell me what you
This seems to encapsulate what you have to offer here nicely.
Bro learn big boy word
Ahh, the incredibly hard to handle "smarty pants" argument. Well played, sir.
So why should women who have advance over some men be given privilege because a small elite group of men have privilege?
The systematic thing you see includes wealth, so is not sexist at the root. Wealth is a much greater privilege than sex.
I see you trying to reason, but you are failing. Wealth being tied to sexism in this case...
I'm not here to convince you, personally, of male privilege. I don't need to. The world is going to change without you on board, which is why you are here trying to uphold the status quo. Enjoy the ride.
Wealth is tied to families. Families are made up of both men and women. Your sexist world-view is just circular making you impossible to reason with.
Wealth is tied to families. Families are made up of both men and women. Your sexist world-view is just circular making you impossible to reason with.
Another failed claim at an absolute. Wealth is demonstrably not tied only to families. Really, you could do better.
Wealth is tied to families. Families are made up of both men and women. Your sexist world-view is just circular making you impossible to reason with.
Another failed claim at an absolute. Wealth is demonstrably not tied only to families. Really, you could do better.
To a true believer, anything that disagrees with their heart is a failed claim.
Obviously family wealth is shared by all members of the family. Only in your world do only men benefit from wealth.
btickler wrote: Problem5826 wrote:
They find house husbands utterly repulsive on a guttural/visceral level.
Ummm, you're a guy that apparently thinks smoking is still cool, so...not sure you really know what the majority of women think these days, but have fun down at the pub .
----
This is just an ridiculous argument, a silly ad hom, you are really bringing nothing to this discussion in good faith in any way, you just seem to be bitter and toxic, repeating the NPC mantra, the MKultra is really really working on you.
Nice to know that women need special privilege because only men benefit from wealth.
I guess all those guys in prison don't count.
This is just an ridiculous argument, a silly ad hom, you are really bringing nothing to this discussion in good faith in any way, you just seem to be bitter and toxic, repeating the NPC mantra, the MKultra is really really working on you.
It's not an argument, Sherlock. Why I would I reply to a non-argument with a cogent argument? Now shoo, go try to get Andrew Tate of out prison or something...
Maybe we are better at chess and at crime.
Obviously there are more men in prison because we have a sexist society.
Yes, that was sarcasm.
Wealth is tied to families. Families are made up of both men and women. Your sexist world-view is just circular making you impossible to reason with.
Another failed claim at an absolute. Wealth is demonstrably not tied only to families. Really, you could do better.
To a true believer, anything that disagrees with their heart is a failed claim.
Obviously family wealth is shared by all members of the family. Only in your world do only men benefit from wealth.
Another obvious and basic debate tactic, you sure are running the gamut of them here...but swapping "wealth" for the now qualified "family wealth" is just you conceding my point.
Obviously there are more men in prison because we have a sexist society.
Yes, that was sarcasm.
Your incarceration argument is the white male form of being "woke" 
. If the Red Pill shaped shoe fits...
I guess in your world only single men are wealthy and are all self made men starting out dirt poor.
I guess in your world only single men are wealthy and are all self made men starting out dirt poor.
Nope, that's all you and your straw-manning. I haven't said a word about single men or men's wealth vs. family wealth. Let me know when you come up any real arguments instead of Tucker Carlson 101.
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
It is by definition privilege.
A narrowly applied correction to a systemic issue of privilege is not itself privilege. It's a correction of applied privilege. "Don't be afraid of what you can't see", Deadmanparty
.