TheGrobe wrote:
Fair enough.
You were being a blowhard and I was being a Canadian....
lol.
He shoots, he scores!
Is chess conceptually flawed?
Sort:
AndyClifton wrote:
froghollow wrote:
But a good thought provoking question . cheers .
lol
It worked , it provoked a thought from AndyClifton : ( nearly ) 
Oh, so that's why the page look 10 minutes to load 
OK now this has just turned into a spam free-for-all
Oh great! The official announcement has been made, ladies and gentlemen!
froghollow wrote:
AndyClifton wrote:
froghollow wrote:
But a good thought provoking question . cheers .
lol
It worked , it provoked a thought from AndyClifton : ( nearly )
I was busy reflecting on what else it seemed to provoke... 
Children relax. Simple question, simple answer.
And imponderable question, spam. Yes, I see now!
Man, when I said no-one likes a self important blowhard it wasn't meant as a request for a demonstration of the principle.
Heh, well, to respond to the OP then, I think your idea is conceptually flawed as your arguments seem to contradict your conclusion. The balance requiring a well played game to last many moves though many transitions is evidence of a well conceptualized game.
Thank you for a sensible posting
poppycock
Dec 19, 2011
0
#179
streetfighter wrote:
In fact, complain about anything you like, to chess.com staff. Just please stop whingeing like a little girl here. Thank you in advance.
Sorry spammer. I have received your self-serving request, and I decline to comply.
Yah...is true...I have blue-ice nads.