psychic chess masters

Sort:
Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:

For some people anyway.

Have you ever taped buttered toast to your cat's back and dropped it to create perpetual motion, because toast always lands buttered side up, and cats always land on their feet, thus it spins forever....?  Having said that.  I have two cats and they are awesome.

ivandh

The butter always slips off the tape when I try that. I'm sure if we could just solve this problem then the energy crisis would be gone forever.

Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:

The butter always slips off the tape when I try that. I'm sure if we could just solve this problem then the energy crisis would be gone forever.

That's the problem with perpetual motion machines.  There's always a catch.  And even if you do create one, the USPTO won't let you take a patent out on one.  For some weird reason, perpetual motion machines are considered impossible.  They obviously haven't seen some of the debates in this thread.  If these revolving arguments aren't of the toast/cat variety, I don't know what is.

sapientdust
Master_Valek wrote:

Tachyons are superluminal particles, and as they slow down and approach lightspeed, they will never reach it as a fundamental limit. They have imaginary mass, a type of negative mass and is completely allowed in relativity and theoretical physics.

Yes, I know what tachyons are. You missed my point. Saying "if a hypothetical particle actually exists, they might harness them for drive systems" is silly. When you are reduced to saying that aliens MIGHT use HYPOTHETICAL particles in some way that nobody but you has ever speculated it might be possible to use them, it's very strong evidence that you've veered into the realm of fantasy, as did I when I talked about harnessing pixie dust as a drive system.

sapientdust
Ubik42 wrote:

People are bad observers of the night sky, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_illusion), have selective attention problems (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWSxSQsspiQ) , and have really bad memories of events.

For example, think back to 9/11 (if you are old enough). The day of the plane crash. Do you remember seeing video of the first plane htting the North tower? Yeah? 

Well, too bad for you. Thats a false memory. Video of the first plane wasnt shown until a few days later. Also, where were you when you heard the news? Whatever your memory is, it about 35% likely to be wrong. You were somewhere else, other than where you remember.

You probably don't believe your memory has such a high chance to be wrong, and there is a very good reason for it. Do you know what it feels like for your memory to be wrong? 

Exactly the way it feels when your memory is correct.

 

bear this stuff in mind as you get caught up in all these believable, convincing eyewitness accounts. yeah, they don't have to be consciously deceiving you, or even themselves. it may help, but it isnt neccesary, their minds will play enough tricks on them to get the job done. Not much extra effort is required.

Absolutely, this is the sort of skepticism and self-doubt that is lacking among the true believers, who think that memory is usually correct and eye-witness testimony is usually reliable.

As Richard Feynman said:

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool.

sapientdust
reflectivist wrote:
ivandh wrote:

For some people anyway.

Have you ever taped buttered toast to your cat's back and dropped it to create perpetual motion, because toast always lands buttered side up, and cats always land on their feet, thus it spins forever....?  Having said that.  I have two cats and they are awesome.

Have you tried it? What actually happens is that the toast flips to the underside of the cat via quanum tunnelling.

trysts
Master_Valek wrote:
trysts wrote:
Master_Valek wrote:
 

In dunoon, there was a sighting in 50's I believe, a group of school children were travelling to school with their teacher when they saw several UFO (silver saucers) cascading the sky above them. 

 

We have had some recent UFO activity since then and my own encounter when I was 14, we saw three UFO's above our house in Innellan, doing some very strange things, nothing but balls of light, moving as though under intelligent control and soundless. 

That's interesting! I'll try to find the Scotland documentary when I wake up. Thanks

Thanks I'd be eager to see it. Another case in scotland was the Pitlockry UFO, two hikers saw a massive triangle UFO accompanied by two Harriers. The UFO moved away at amazing speeds but they did take a photo of it.

 

The photo ended in the hands of the MInistry of Defense, and Nick Pope had it sent to be anaylzed to find out whether it was real. The consesus was that it was in fact a real object, but the original photograph mysteriously vanished and the two hikers names had disappeared from record. 

I'm sorry, it was in Whales, not Scotland:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-18798867

Irontiger
trysts wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:

Yes, and so did people particpating in a study, who were asked soon after the event where they were. Then they were asked again. much later. 

These answers didn't match up very well. Depending on what you were asking (who you were with, where were you, how did you find out) there were error rates approaching 40%. 

And if you don't think you could possible be in error - well, neither did the 35% or so who were wrong. its just numbers. your memories of the event have about a 35% error rate.

Not my memories, of course, which are perfect.

Three out of ten UFO reports could be faulty memory? Okay.

No. Three out of one thousand.

But the nine hundred ninety seven others did not report the satellite they saw as a "UFO", as they recognised it was a satellite.

pdela

life doesn't make sense

pdela

I remember when I was a child having seeing something beyond the clouds, no wonder, do you know the brain mess up with your remembrances and constantly rewrites your memory to build a consistent history, then there are this collective effect if some place is told to be a UFO scenario, then everybody starts to witness UFOs in that place

pdela

most of them are desiring to watch a UFO

pdela

replace a for an when needed

Ubik42
pdela wrote:

I remember when I was a child having seeing something beyond the clouds, no wonder, do you know the brain mess up with your remembrances and constantly rewrites your memory to build a consistent history, then there are this collective effect if some place is told to be a UFO scenario, then everybody starts to witness UFOs in that place

Yes, people think their brain and memories are like some sort of video camera. They aren't.

Knightly_News
Ubik42 wrote:
pdela wrote:

I remember when I was a child having seeing something beyond the clouds, no wonder, do you know the brain mess up with your remembrances and constantly rewrites your memory to build a consistent history, then there are this collective effect if some place is told to be a UFO scenario, then everybody starts to witness UFOs in that place

Yes, people think their brain and memories are like some sort of video camera. They aren't.

So based on the fact that people might have distorted memories, or be dishonest or duped, you conclude that everyone who believes they've seen a UFO that is or might be extra-terrestrial did not?  Is that the bottom line?  Is there any room in your mind for it still to be a question?

BhomasTrown

I thought you might say that.

Knightly_News
BhomasTrown wrote:

I thought you might say that.

You thought?  I was quite certain that a lot of people would respond with that joke so often that it would be like Deja Vu all over again.

BhomasTrown
reflectivist wrote:
BhomasTrown wrote:

I thought you might say that.

You thought?  I was quite certain that a lot of people would respond with that joke so often that it would be like Deja Vu all over again.

There's no way I'm going to sort thru 32 pages to see if someone already wrote something similar. A bold gambit on my part, I know.

Knightly_News

Has anyone read this book?

 

On February 4, 1974, members of the Symbionese Liberation Army kidnapped nineteen-year-old newspaper heiress Patricia Hearst from her Berkeley, California apartment. Desperate to find her, the police called physicist Russell Targ and Pat Price, a psychic retired police commissioner. As Price turned the pages of the police mug book filled with hundreds of photos, suddenly he pointed to one of them and announced, “That’s the ringleader.” The man was Donald DeFreeze, who was indeed subsequently so identified. Price also described the type and location of the kidnap car, enabling the police to find it within minutes. That remarkable event is one reason Targ believes in ESP. Another occurred when his group made $120,000 by forecasting for nine weeks in a row the changes in the silver-commodity futures market.

As a scientist, Targ demands proof. His experience is based on two decades of investigations at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which he cofounded with physicist Harold Puthoff in 1972. This twenty-million dollar program launched during the Cold War was supported by the CIA, NASA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Army and Air Force Intelligence. The experiments they conducted routinely presented results could have happened by chance less than once in a million. Targ describes four types of experiments:

1. Remote Viewing, in which a person describes places and events independent of space and time. For example, while in California Price drew to scale a Soviet weapons factory at Semipalitinsk with great accuracy later confirmed by Satellite photography. In another remote viewing, Targ accurately sketched an airport in San Andreas, Columbia himself. 

2. Distant Mental Influence, where the thoughts of the experimenter can positively or negatively affect the physiology (heart rate, skin resistance, etc.) of a distant person.

3. Whole field isolation, where someone in a state of sensory isolation accurately describes the visual experiences of someone else in another place.

4. Precognition and retrocausality, showing that the future can affect the past. That is, the elephant you see on television in the morning can be the cause of your having dreamed about elephants the previous night.

Final chapters present evidence for survival after death; explain how ESP works based on the Buddhist/Hindu view of our selves as nonlocal, eternal awareness; discuss the ethics of exercising psychic abilities,and show us how to explore ESP ourselves. “I am convinced,” Targ says, “that most people can learn to move from their ordinary mind to one not obstructed by conventional barriers of space and time. Who would not want to try that?”

Irontiger
reflectivist wrote:

So based on the fact that people might have distorted memories, or be dishonest or duped, you conclude that everyone who believes they've seen a UFO that is or might be extra-terrestrial did not?  Is that the bottom line?  Is there any room in your mind for it still to be a question?

Well, there is also the alcohol factor. It cannot be ruled out.

Knightly_News
Irontiger wrote:
reflectivist wrote:

So based on the fact that people might have distorted memories, or be dishonest or duped, you conclude that everyone who believes they've seen a UFO that is or might be extra-terrestrial did not?  Is that the bottom line?  Is there any room in your mind for it still to be a question?

Well, there is also the alcohol factor. It cannot be ruled out.

Well, the bottle in front of you is better than a frontal labotaloo