I think I understand the debate, and, please, lets not turn it into an argument.
Irontiger: I understand how one would want to see all the moves that have developed to a certain position. I'm a hack when it comes to the game, and, confronted with a board showing a position in the middlegame, it takes some time for me to evaluate. As in, what was the plan for either side? It's difficult for us to analyze as you can.
Jadarite: I understand (and you should, too) how a player like Irontiger (1900+) has the ability to see a position and realize what is the best move quickly, regardless of how the players came to it.
As far as upgrading to become a better player, the fee really is minimal if one is going to use the tools available.
"If you want to study openings and see how to reach certain middle game positions well then thats another form of study."
Chess.com can't show us the game's opening? This is another form of study? Come on now. I wasn't born off a turnip truck.
"you are argueing with him for the sake of being difficult, or you really don't understand the point."
I understand you are a diamond slave. I understand you feel you need to defend the "diamond". It sounds so Indiana Jones of you to protect this diamond.
However, no, I don't get the point. What is the point in paying twice as much for something and not getting a record of the games from move 1?
lol. ok its clear your a troll and do not care to be rational so I will end this debate here.