Maybe when he was 6
Is my jump in rating unprecedented?
Sort:
Logic is backwards. It's much harder for a gm to improve because they already know almost everything. On the other hand a simple change in opening or learning to castle or something can bring you from 800 to 1100.
BrownsteinbearPawn wrote:
Maybe when he was 6
6, 76 age is just a number.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#65
2Q1C wrote:
BrownsteinbearPawn wrote:
Maybe when he was 6
And look at him now. Champion of the world.
Well that is a fact
In one month, my rating (rapid) went from somewhere around 500 (I know, I'm terrible) to a max of 1050, just two days ago. (Now I'm rated 1022). It's true. Check my history.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#67
If you really want to feel big headed about it, your rating jumped 37%. A 2500 GM would have to increase to 3425 to match your achievement!
woton wrote:
If you really want to feel big headed about it, your rating jumped 37%. A 2500 GM would have to increase to 3425 to match your achievement!
Wow, that is extremely impressive.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#69
woton wrote:
If you really want to feel big headed about it, your rating jumped 37%. A 2500 GM would have to increase to 3425 to match your achievement!
When you put it that way. Holy schnikees!!!
BrownsteinbearPawn wrote:
woton wrote:
If you really want to feel big headed about it, your rating jumped 37%. A 2500 GM would have to increase to 3425 to match your achievement!
When you put it that way. Holy schnikees!!!
I know right?
Jan 27, 2017
0
#71
You're now up against the "law of diminishing returns." A 293 increase is only 27%. You'll have to work harder.
woton wrote:
You're now up against the "law of diminishing returns." A 293 increase is only 27%. You'll have to work harder.
This is Chess not Economics.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#73
You're right. That's what's so amazing about the ldr. It 's an economics concept that is applicable to many things.
woton wrote:
You're right. That's what's so amazing about the ldr. It 's an economics concept that is applicable to many things.
Sorry I didn't mean to be rude. You might be new to the site. So just an FYI there is an "Off-topic" forum on the site. There you can discuss non-related chess topic such as Economics, etc. Thanks for your input though.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#75
Vlad you are world class.
I don't even feel worthy posting in your thread
IpswichMatt wrote:
Vlad you are world class
Yes, you are Worldclass, Matt
Jan 27, 2017
0
#77
What's off topic? You have to put in more effort to go from 1100 to 1400 than you did to go from 800 to 1100 (ratings rounded off).
woton wrote:
What's off topic? You have to put in more effort to go from 1100 to 1400 than you did to go from 800 to 1100 (ratings rounded off).
You were talking about economics before. Some law of diminishing returns, that's what I was referring to. No problem though. I just like to stay on topic in my threads. I've had people go off-topic in my threads before and it just derails the whole thing. I had this one guy comparing classical music to chess once believe it or not.
Jan 27, 2017
0
#79
This thread is funny but Some of these replies are hilarious!!
I think at your rate of progress you will be rated 4000 in about a year and a half especially if u stop leaving your queen en prise in the first 10 moves or so...Carlson watch out
I think at your rate of progress you will be rated 4000 in about a year and a half especially if u stop leaving your queen en prise in the first 10 moves or so...Carlson watch out
Dude there is NOTHING impressive about 1075! Even if you started at 500!!! Start a thread when you get to expert, that will be impressive.
Lol...you scoff at his meteoric rise, but this man is only 25. He is in his prime, and likely to be in contention for the World Championship 2018, at this rate.