Forums

Is refusing to accept a draw because of a misclick bad sportmanship?

Sort:
x6px

it's not really a measure of who should win or not when someone misclicks and blunders but if they're losing already don't accept lol, btw most of those misclickers just stall afterwards

DenialOfNature

what if opponent misclicks deliberately to draw a lost game

bobby_max

You should accept a draw if it's a very obvious misclick. In fact, you should offer a draw if you spot this without waiting to be asked. It's called being a decent human being.

BigChessplayer665

Nope if you feel bad except draw ,if you don'tnfeel bad don't except draw I mean what if someone missclicked over the board

uri65
bobby_max wrote:

You should accept a draw if it's a very obvious misclick. In fact, you should offer a draw if you spot this without waiting to be asked. It's called being a decent human being.

Decent human being will not expect others to cover for his sloppiness.

Optimissed
bobby_max wrote:

You should accept a draw if it's a very obvious misclick. In fact, you should offer a draw if you spot this without waiting to be asked. It's called being a decent human being.

People generally misclick when they're trying to play too fast to get a time advantage. It's their lookout. I would prefer not to be a decent human being, if that's the definition of decent.

As for accepting a draw due to a misclick when your opponent is losing, you have to be a bit soft in the head to do that, since why didn't they resign if the game is already won for you?

copiumpepe

my guy trying to trick u bruv you have absolutely and i mean absolutely no reason to accept draws when you are winning cos why yes???? it does not makes sense and if the other guy says you have bad sportsmanship because of that first he's dumb second hes dumb third he's clearly got a case of brain rot

personally i think people who offer draws when they are losing are jerks so yeah

have a good day mate