Is there a way to avoid blunders?

Sort:
IsraeliGal
Omega_Doom wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Not all 1 move blunders are the same level of stupid. OP is implying his blunders are uncharacteristically bad for his level.

Obviously eliminating all blunders is a stupid question, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and trying to answer the reasonable version of the question.

For my level? I analyzed my last game - 3 blunders, 4 mistakes and i won. Horrendous.

So what? ur opponent blunders as well.

That's how u win. 

if u didn't blunder you'd be Stockfish 2.0

 

Omega_Doom
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Not all 1 move blunders are the same level of stupid. OP is implying his blunders are uncharacteristically bad for his level.

Obviously eliminating all blunders is a stupid question, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and trying to answer the reasonable version of the question.

For my level? I analyzed my last game - 3 blunders, 4 mistakes and i won. Horrendous.

So what? ur opponent blunders as well.

That's how u win. 

if u didn't blunder you'd be Stockfish 2.0

 

Okay. I am talking about big blunders like one move and resigns. Do i need to make them to make my opponents win?

IsraeliGal
Omega_Doom wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Not all 1 move blunders are the same level of stupid. OP is implying his blunders are uncharacteristically bad for his level.

Obviously eliminating all blunders is a stupid question, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and trying to answer the reasonable version of the question.

For my level? I analyzed my last game - 3 blunders, 4 mistakes and i won. Horrendous.

So what? ur opponent blunders as well.

That's how u win. 

if u didn't blunder you'd be Stockfish 2.0

 

Okay. I am talking about big blunders like one move and resigns. Do i need to make them to make my opponents win?

I'm saying you will always make those "Big blunders". You could reduce the frequency a bit, but thats all you can do. You will continue to make big blunders because ur human. 

Like I said, even Magnus makes big blunders, albeit not as often as u, but he still does. 

So if u still don't understand that this is something that will always happen to u, especially as a player thats much weaker than carlsen, idk what else to tell u.

 

jonnin

It decreases with longer time controls but not as much as you think.   Apparently my style leads to moves that work when the opponent has no time, but are actually poor if they can consider it for a bit -- the opposite problem.  Perhaps you would excel at slow chess, inversely to how I do better at faster times...  

zBotXTRON

try vision boards to avoid blunders and look carefully for Checkmates Omega_Doom. happy.png

JackRoach
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Not all 1 move blunders are the same level of stupid. OP is implying his blunders are uncharacteristically bad for his level.

Obviously eliminating all blunders is a stupid question, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and trying to answer the reasonable version of the question.

For my level? I analyzed my last game - 3 blunders, 4 mistakes and i won. Horrendous.

So what? ur opponent blunders as well.

That's how u win. 

if u didn't blunder you'd be Stockfish 2.0

 

Okay. I am talking about big blunders like one move and resigns. Do i need to make them to make my opponents win?

I'm saying you will always make those "Big blunders". You could reduce the frequency a bit, but thats all you can do. You will continue to make big blunders because ur human. 

Like I said, even Magnus makes big blunders, albeit not as often as u, but he still does. 

So if u still don't understand that this is something that will always happen to u, especially as a player thats much weaker than carlsen, idk what else to tell u.

 

I know you are trying to sound sophisticated and everything, but when you say "u" instead of "you," then it's harder for us to see you as a reliable source.

IsraeliGal
JackRoach wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Omega_Doom wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Not all 1 move blunders are the same level of stupid. OP is implying his blunders are uncharacteristically bad for his level.

Obviously eliminating all blunders is a stupid question, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and trying to answer the reasonable version of the question.

For my level? I analyzed my last game - 3 blunders, 4 mistakes and i won. Horrendous.

So what? ur opponent blunders as well.

That's how u win. 

if u didn't blunder you'd be Stockfish 2.0

 

Okay. I am talking about big blunders like one move and resigns. Do i need to make them to make my opponents win?

I'm saying you will always make those "Big blunders". You could reduce the frequency a bit, but thats all you can do. You will continue to make big blunders because ur human. 

Like I said, even Magnus makes big blunders, albeit not as often as u, but he still does. 

So if u still don't understand that this is something that will always happen to u, especially as a player thats much weaker than carlsen, idk what else to tell u.

 

I know you are trying to sound sophisticated and everything, but when you say "u" instead of "you," then it's harder for us to see you as a reliable source.

I don't care to sound sophisticated, I just want to to get my message out as quickly as possible so I can move on, which is exactly why I say "u" instead of "you". If me shortening a 3 letter bloody word irritates you then that shows ur own inadequacies more than mine.