Is there such thing as "luck" in chess?


3. I personally can't stand this community. Its full of alt accounts and rating manipulators.
You can make this site better very easily. Leave.
Your cheating accusations are absurd in view of the quality of your play. https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/how-beginners-play
You like everyone to leave the sport altogether, Thats why you constantly make demeaning marks about low rated players and blitz. You know, the majority of worldwide chess community> My theory is, because people like you want to feel like you are of superior intelligence for playing a game most of society "can't". But you are lying to yourself buddy. lmao
Listen, if you can. I've taught over one thousand young players to play chess. I discourage blitz when they are beginners because it cultivates bad habits. Fast play creates sloppiness. I know, I played tens of thousands of games that are utterly horrid.
When I'm talking about absolute beginners with zero board vision playing too much blitz instead of learning fundamental contacts, I'm not addressing the "majority". A percentile below 10 is a minority, just as a percentile above 90 is.
I'm actually offering help, but you're in Plato's Cave watching shadows.

Maybe it’s you.

If I return to coaching in the spring I will probably pick his brain a bit now that I know he is a more experienced coach.

@CooloutAC
One thing you will never find a good teacher doing:
Taking advice from someone whose understanding of the subject is in the bottom 10%.
But again, you are missing the key point. I'm not against blitz. I recommend that players learn something about the game first.
When I could not keep more than half of my shots in a seven inch circle at ten yards, I sought advice on the fundamentals and slowed down. After lots of slow practice, I kicked the rate of my firing back up, but 90% of the shots now land in a three inch circle at ten yards. I can learn to do better, so I continue to work on the fundamentals--trigger control, breathing, etc.
Good that you like blitz. By all means play it. Do try to spend some time on tactics training instead of accusing players as bad as you are of cheating. Buy a book on checkmate patterns and read it.
Renaud and Kahn, The Art of the Checkmate is excellent.
Haven't read much of the thread.
Of course there's luck in chess. In a Swiss system tournament, you have little control over which opponent you get paired against, or whether you have White or Black against your most dangerous opponents. These things are determined by the number of players entering the tournament, and by the distribution of their ratings and early-round results... random factors that you have no control over.
Luck, in other words.
It is very true. Swiss and knock-out tournaments (or even round robin, but far less) involve luck. But it is not specific to chess. The same would hold for checkers tournaments, tennis tournaments, football, etc.
But as far as the outcome of one single game of chess is concerned, there's practically no luck involved.
Luck is definitely an element of the game. You can get a lucky pairing in a tournament or make a lucky move (you only have 16 pieces so something like a max of around 100 possible moves in a position to consider; if you know nothing about chess other than how to make a legal move, then 1 in 100 is pretty decent odds to select the best one!), but you can't have a lucky career.
In this sense, it is more similar to something like golf then something like running. A hobby golfer could hit a single better shot than a pro one in a thousand tries, but they will never have a better round then one. On the flip side, a hobby jogger will simply never come close beating a pro over any distance over say 1k over the course of a race (barring injuries in both cases)

This is so dumb I don’t know where to start. Parents don’t run around with a thesaurus asking if chess is a sport.
I only want them in my class if the kid is enthusiastic about chess.
Many of the parents want their kids to participate in a tournament, and that is one of my main goals too.
My beginner class teaches them rules and some basics, my advanced class is tournament preparation, though some don’t do tournaments for various reasons.
All the big tournaments for kids are 1 hour long games, usually 5 games, which is a full day of chess. There will usually be one every week or two. No one does blitz tournaments like that, so go organize a blitz tourney for 400 kids if you really want to try it.

Me:”Yeah I am going to teach the kids slow chess as practice for blitz”
Parent: “Oh…. preparing them for a blitz tournament”?
Me:”No. All the tournaments are slow chess “
Parent:”….? I don’t understand?”
Me: “It’s what some guy on the internet told me. Yeah he never coached before, but gosh it just sounded like good advice. Also, the kids are blundering even faster than they used to. It’s a good thing you hired a coach!”

How close am I to hitting home?

My comments to ziryab hit home with you eh? Good. Because you are no different then him.
than
"no different"=intelligent and informed and cares about chess and kids


All the big tournaments for kids are 1 hour long games, usually 5 games, which is a full day of chess. There will usually be one every week or two. No one does blitz tournaments like that, so go organize a blitz tourney for 400 kids if you really want to try it.
Round one started at 11:00 am. It is 1:50 pm and 75% of the round three games are underway. The two weakest players lost in less than five minutes. The time control is g/30.

Why am I fair game in this regard and it are not?
You like everyone to leave the sport altogether,
Of course. That's why I currently have about 100 elementary age students in my classes and clubs. That's why I ran a tournament for young players yesterday, and why I am running a longer one today.
I hope you keep your interest in chess. I would like it if you stop attacking people on this site and the site itself. I would like it if you could learn to recognize checkmate. You could contribute to this site. Why you choose negativity only you can answer.