MrKornKid wrote:
I'd say neither. Just a couple of hanging pieces
It is a pin AND a skewer.
A pin because the knight cannot move without hanging the bishop.
A skewer because when the knight moves, the bishop falls.
It's an unusual form of Double Attack.
It's only a Pin if the piece behind the attacked piece is more valuable either in intrinsic value or because the piece behind is blocking, defending, etc. a more valuable piece.
It's only a Skewer if the piece behind the attacked piece is either less valuable either in intrinsic value or because the attacked piece is blocking, defending, etc. a more valuable piece.
It is NEITHER. The Bishop isn't pinned, and it's not a skewer because you can't go through the Bishop to get the Knight if the former doesn't move.
since the bishop can move with check. I call it a bad example. put the white king on f1 and one of the peices is Toast for sure.
by the Way; once you take the knight (assuming check Wasn't possible)this is a great endgame challenge. the R CAN checkmate against a Bishop and a King; but you have to be SO careful with skewers and forks.
Interesting comments. Does anyone have an opinion on whether this is a win, loss or draw for white. Also everyone seems to assume it is black to move. If it is white to move then it is a straight taking of an unprotected piece where white takes the bishop (maybe called miss-coordinated pieces), then a double attack on the knight and king, then when the knight interposes, it is a pin.
Next topic, is light a wave or a particle?