Even if you're winning, you still need to finish of your opponent. the game was repeated 3 times, and the game is drawn.
Is this game drawn by repetition - Not fair?

Ok. agreed. My mistake. But I did not play Rf6 again to complete the third repetition in the 49th move.

Right, immediately after white makes moves 45, 47, and 49, the positions are all identical. Three or more is the prerequisite to claim a draw by repetition, and it is a valid claim. You are under the mistaken assumption that it is only the position at the 'end' of a move (i.e. after black's 49th move) that matters. It doesn't work that way; as soon as white makes his 49th move he can immediately claim draw by repetition without giving black a chance to move.
Well, you should be right. In that case, no hard feelings. I will be more careful next time onwards.

No problem, it's easy to get confused on these kinds of topics. In the future, however, there's really no reason to make two different forum threads for the same thing, especially in such a short time frame.
Thanks. I am sorry to make two different forum threads. I made the second in the help and support section as there was no reply in this thread first.

Insufficient Material is much trickier to untangle for the uninitiated.
Well, English is not my native language. What is the meaning of uninitiated? I hope you are not insulting me.
At the end of 11 th (Black) move too there has been a triple repeat !!
The game has extended far beyond it. :)

Insufficient Material is much trickier to untangle for the uninitiated.
Well, English is not my native language. What is the meaning of uninitiated? I hope you are not insulting me.
Uninitiated=not exposed to the material
Everyone gets their chance to learn here, I hope.

Insufficient Material is much trickier to untangle for the uninitiated.
Well, English is not my native language. What is the meaning of uninitiated? I hope you are not insulting me.
I checked the dictionary. I want to say that I am not a newbie. I know about the insufficient material part. And also this was not my first game drawn by repetition. But, I always thought there should be 3 full moves - by both white and black for the draw.
According to my understanding of the rules of Chess, the player whose move when made will constitute repetion of position may claim a draw prior to making the move.

It's three repetitions of a position, not a move. If the same position, with the same player to move, is reached three times, either player can play a draw. So, for instance, I think this would be a draw:
I don't think that there was repetition for 3 times in the following game:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game.html?id=313373173
I should have won it as my opponent was under time pressure, me being up with two pawns with only a few pieces on the board and he being lower rated than me.
What do you think?
Thanks a lot.