Please vote for me to decide!
RULES:
If people vote 50 ticks in 7 days (1 week), this person will be reported.
If not, I will still be watching his trace for about 2 days.
Posted 7:53 am 10/12/2021 (UTC)
Is this person cheating?
Sort:
do say who, @them here
also the games which happened to be off if you could
Dec 10, 2021
0
#7
greypenguin wrote:
do say who, @them here
Sorry, I cannot say who "someone" is as it is against the rules of a forum discussion.
then do provide more details?
i can get 90+ accuracy on some good games. is it consistent or extremely fluctuating?
Dec 10, 2021
0
#10
Data Inadequate . No conclusive evidence to prove that he's cheating , although there's plenty of it that gives us a slight hint that he might be .
Besides reporting is pointless . If he's guilty he will be punished without being reported as well
Dec 10, 2021
0
#11
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Data Inadequate . No conclusive evidence to prove that he's cheating , although there's plenty of it that gives us a slight hint that he might be .
Besides reporting is pointless . If he's guilty he will be punished without being reported as well
Sure, well said. I will continue to observe and search for more hints. If not hints are provided within the next week, I will move on.
X
Kesarling_UT wrote:
X
We can say neither just now, so this.
I know that some ‘engines’ like chess next move hardly get accuracies over 95 percent but consistently can get 90 percent. The player may be using this. However I think there is insufficient evidence for you to make a decision yet. (Otherwise it will have to be benefit of the doubt for them).
Dec 10, 2021
0
#15
Also, other evidence this person is cheating is that he takes a suspiciously long time to figure out things in a tight position...
Dec 10, 2021
0
#16
ChessNerd49 wrote:
I know that some ‘engines’ like chess next move hardly get accuracies over 95 percent but consistently can get 90 percent. The player may be using this. However I think there is insufficient evidence for you to make a decision yet. (Otherwise it will have to be benefit of the doubt for them).
Yes, that is why I made a vote.
Dec 10, 2021
0
#17
ChessFlair01 wrote:
Also, other evidence this person is cheating is that he takes a suspiciously long time to figure out things in a tight position...
I was playing him just then in a tournament.
Ok, you may want to check his other games, to see if he consistently gets high accuracies as well. Otherwise it may have just been a one off on his part.
ChessFlair01 wrote:
ChessFlair01 wrote:
Also, other evidence this person is cheating is that he takes a suspiciously long time to figure out things in a tight position...
I was playing him just then in a tournament.
that is actually a sign of NOT cheating. cheaters usually take 3-5 seconds per move consistantly as they check their engine
Someone (I won't mention who in public) has probably been using a second account for live analysis, but I doubt that because live analysis only shows you who is winning.
My friend has experienced a cheater as a 700 rating beat a 1500, with the opponent having a rocketing 91.5! Although some moves, pins and well-found checks and strategies, I still am in thought about this round of chess.
This person may be using a chess engine to go against the rules, but to my observation, rounds have been lost recently and 91.5 isn't the best a good cheat chess engine can do.
Please vote below, and only vote once!
✔ If you think he/she is a suspect
X If you think he/she is innocent
(Note: copy-paste the tick or cross for your vote)
Also, for convenience, please use the thumbs up and down emojis.
💬ChessFlair01
~Making the community safer and better