Again, if you know anything about chess you know what a flawed metric accuracy is - anyone can get high accuracy if they’re playing pretty simple positions. Your accuracy if your rating is legitimate would presumably mean you’re playing more complex openings and positions than most players.
Also, back to the main point, why do you feel the need to use the same line about chomping hanging pieces all the time?? I mean in your win against the titled player the other day you hung a skewer, you hang pieces too. Everyone does occasionally. That’s not what makes someone 2400 standard.
It felt way too easy chomping on hanging pieces to 2400 blitz. I just needed 60-70% accuracy to win games.