Is this suspicious or am I just rubbish at chess?

I think it's sus. 94.5 accuracy from a 200 rated player wouldn't be very natural if the game didn't end in like 5 moves

I have reported him. Last game in the tournament and he's beaten a 999 rated player with 97% accuracy.

Looks like he first started cheating when playing you lol. A bit unlucky that
Yes, I noticed that

Beat a 1005 player with 99%? Yep, that's not good. I'd post the game, but I don't think I can name another member specifically and accuse them of cheating.

No, I think all one can do is report it and leave it to chess.com to deal with it; ask Hans Moke Neiman about people accusing him of cheating

Yeah this is either an engine or a super-GM. No 200 in existence would even consider playing like he did.

Don't throw stones in glass houses.

Lol, I've known that for a long time; says one 800 rated player to another

I have had points returned to me in the past where chess.com has banned someone for 'unfair play'. I've no idea who they were as they don't tell you why or who was cheating, or when.


It's not the points, it's the principle of the matter. I'm trying to get better by playing games against people, if I want to play games against a computer, I can do that, I don't need someone else to use one against me. Cheaters are like sports drugs users or some other scum of the earth, if you can't win fairly, why even bother playing; it's pathetic.
And it wasn't 9 points, it was 19 and when you only have a rating of 850 ish, that's a lot.
I recently played someone with a rating of 209 and he beat me with an accuracy of 94.5% but all his/her previous games against much weaker players (c. 200) are around 40-45% accuracy. I realise I could just have played rubbish, I usually do, but I get suspicious when someone is suddenly playing like an engine.