Isn't 'game review' slightly silly?

Your game is reviewed with 'suggestions' from an engine that far exceeds the strength of any human coach....I mean frankly are the lines it suggests any worth to a 1600 player?

To a 2000 player?

2400?

Are we all supposed to take from these game reviews that we should try to play more like an engine rated 3400 than a human!?

Don't let your chess self esteem suffer if you don't play the engines suggestions...you are not a machine!

A better move is a better move, even if your move was good enough to win.

That is the exact opposite of being silly

I forked the queen and rook with a knight and it was an "inaccuracy". The move suggested captured no material and gained no obvious strategic advantage that a beginner would ever recognize or consider. It's frustrating because the machine never gives any reasoning, so it is pointless without context.

From a beginners perspective I think it can help to get an idea of what I should've been doing when I wasn't sure what to do. Though it does put alot of focus on material advantage witch I would call a draw back, if I can't utilize a rook as well as a bishop for instance then technically the worse move would be better for me. I think with more practice then a small handful of games that might change, but it does seem to setup possisions I couldn't maximize if I wanted too so I take it with a grain of salt.

Playing a good move for the sake of playing a good move is bad, in the same way that mimicking the openings that gms play with no understanding of the ideas behind that opening is bad. Instead of calling it silly, find the idea behind it, and it’ll help you find it in a real game. Of course, if you were in a totally winning position, and the computer scolds you for doing a mate in 3 instead of a mate in two, then yeah screw off computer.