Do you agree with Garry?
Kasparov about Nakamura
Kasparov: "Nakamura would start having real chances to become World Champion if he stopped trying to make every game entertaining"
Thoughts?
I get what he's saying, but I also think Nakamura is a little soft in the endgame.

Without having studied what 'risks' or problematical innovations, said player has, whilst playing 'black'; Assuming, that he, {'H.N'}; Is prone, to that sort of 'entertaining' move-endulgence; In-the-course-of playing, at a 'half-tempo-disadvantage'..{ie. 'black'}; Then, it-strikes-me, as reasonable; That, he should No longer engage in that 'habit'..{if it exists}; Than, for him, {or Any player}, to take-up-smoking; So-as-to 'calm-his-nerves.' [ ;
Without having studied what 'risks' or problematical innovations, said player has, whilst playing 'black'; Assuming, that he, {'H.N'}; Is prone, to that sort of 'entertaining' move-endulgence; In-the-course-of playing, at a 'half-tempo-disadvantage'..{ie. 'black'}; Then, it-strikes-me, as reasonable; That, he should No longer engage in that 'habit'..{if it exists}; Than, for him, {or Any player}, to take-up-smoking; So-as-to 'calm-his-nerves.' [ ;
Your writing syle intrigues me.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Kasparov: "Nakamura would start having real chances to become World Champion if he stopped trying to make every game entertaining"
Thoughts?
I get what he's saying, but I also think Nakamura is a little soft in the endgame.
Hes just as good as any other top gm in endgames.
hes proven that in many games
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Please be useful, relevant and nice.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Please be useful, relevant and nice.
Take your own advice.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Please be useful, relevant and nice.
Take your own advice.
Please learn to read before posting in my threads.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Please be useful, relevant and nice.
Take your own advice.
Please learn to read before posting in my threads.
I don't have anything to say - just want to join in on the fun.
Yes. But his playing style helped to get his fan base and sponsors
Well, I suppose being a loser with a huge fanbase is not too bad.
better than being a loser with no fanbase aka op.
Please be useful, relevant and nice.
Take your own advice.
Please learn to read before posting in my threads.
I don't have anything to say - just want to join in on the fun.
Following the example of Her Greatness
Blocked.

Kasparov: "Nakamura would start having real chances to become World Champion if he stopped trying to make every game entertaining"
Thoughts?