Well, yes and no.
3 minute games are all about time. So have no worries about your opponent losing on time
If however you had played for time and your opponent flagged with K+B vs K+B you would not have got a win on this site. It would be a draw. Under FIDE rules you would have got a win, but this site uses a USCF hybrid rule which is implimented by a simple piece count of your pieces. The computer would determine that a K+B cannot force a mate and thus the game is drawn.
I was in an online blitz game (3 minutes and no increment) vs a better player, and I was down a pawn, KBP v KB, bishops on opposite colours.
I managed to snaffle the pawn, and I ignorantly expected the game to end with a draw due to insufficient material, but no, we were still live. I had a bit of a time advantage: my opponent offered me his bishop, and I took it, which of course led to the draw due to insufficient material.
I checked the Rules and sure enough, B v B on opposite colours doesn't bring down the draw. It made me wonder how a win could occur with such material, and I suppose the only way it could happen was if someone was such a numpty as to block their king in the corner with their own bishop.
So it seems that it is I who is the numpty and what I should have done was refuse the proffered bishop, play on and win on time. Right?