Kramnik Hates Chess.com

Very useful article chessdodger

This article shows that the cheating system is pretty good, as grandmasters approved it.

And cheating is a grandmaster and tilted player issue

Titled

Watch Kramnik's channel not some random channels with <100 viewers and you will know.

Until basketstorm hits ELO 400 we should limit him to one post per day

My Elo is much higher than 400. You have no games and no rating, so by your logic you shouldn't post at all.

We can see your recent games, you consistently lose to human players who are rated 400 and less on this site, all evidence suggests you are around 360 elo. You do play bots that are rated higher than that, but elo is not determined by your performance against bots, it's a measure of your performance against a certain player pool. Elo varies from one player pool to the next... on this site you are reliably losing to 400 rated players.

560 - 400 = 160 ELO

I do not think 160 ELO is much higher.

edited moderator AndrewSmith 

Like I said, I spent a lot of time investigating it. It's clear you spent none, or if you did you didn't learn from it. You certainly haven't absorbed anything meaningful I or others here have said. It's why I can't debate you any longer. I guess if Kramnik becomes persuaded that actual experts like professors of statistics know things he doesn't, you might take your cue from him, but if that happens, which it wont, you should not follow his lead. You should think about cheat detection with a critical but open mind, instead of relying on the opinion of your hero. Anyway, I insinuated you're ignorant, which I shouldn't have, so I apologize. Good luck with your chess, wherever you play. As Neal Bellon says in his sign off, I hope you win your next game.

No, they are not my games.

No, it's not "clear" that I spent none, that's just your opinion. Did you write at least one chess engine that tries to imitate human play?

Kramnik offered exactly that idea - to hire actual experts in math and statistics but independent, unbiased, not affiliated with chess.com, Kramnik offered to cover their pay, but chess.com refused. So instead Kramnik has hired a team of experts mathematicians and statisticians. It's not like he is making his own conclusions besides he is not pushing any conclusions, he is just showing some data, some FACTS, and asking to investigate while chess.com ignores or refutes that with silly excuses. For example, Kramnik was pointing at DOZENS of Hikaru streaks, but chess.com and their experts investigated only ONE. Next, Kramnik is not sure about Hikaru that he is a cheater, he is more inclined to think that Hikaru's opponents either deliberately lose or they are just weak, their rating is fake and they afraid to cheat against Hikaru. You need to watch his videos more carefully.

I am starting to be convinced that you are a Kramnik alternate account at this point.

Your account looks very interesting.

Just because you and your youtube superstars disagree with Kramnik, doesn't mean only Kramnik would agree with himself

To do the procedure.

Danya fan, I see