Kramnik mentioned 🔥🔥
Kramnik Takes Polygraph Test for Cheating!
Sort:
A lie detector isn't a lie detector since it can't detect lies.
Aug 24, 2024
0
#5
xtreme2020 wrote:
Spoiler alert turns out kramnik was actually the one cheating
But the test said he didn't
Iuminaru wrote:
VladimirKramnik wrote:
Not many people willing to comment here 😁
why are you always get involved in cheating scandals 🗿
he is a former cheater. Really interested. He would be our cheat detector
Aug 24, 2024
0
#10
They work, but as the guy said in one of the videos, they usually take hours for each question in real investigations, so a few seconds isn’t really enough
A polygraph wouldn't have proved anything in Elista back in 2006.
Aug 24, 2024
0
#13
I guess someone didn't get the memo that polygraphs are highly unreliable.
Aug 24, 2024
0
#15
A polygraph could scare somebody into telling the truth though.
Especially if the questions are unexpected.
Or it could indicate a false positive.
Aug 24, 2024
0
#17
we don't need to relitigate the pseudo-science of polygraphs here, there is plenty of research at the tip of your finger.
torture doesn't work either, before anyone gets any ideas.
Aug 24, 2024
0
#18
Artful_Chess_Dodger wrote:
https://en.chessbase.com/post/kramnik-takes-polygraph-test
I wonder if Naka will take a test?
he did
Aug 24, 2024
0
#19
jmaskell wrote:
Or it could indicate a false positive.
Not my point. Yes it could.
But the point is when information is provided - that can lead to other information or evidence.
Especially when details are provided.
Unknown details that can then be verified.
Example.
Did you ... ?
Where?
Location follows.
Location is checked out.
Point: the 'hidden mission' of polygraph tests ...
not to see if somebody's lying or not. Its to get information.
https://en.chessbase.com/post/kramnik-takes-polygraph-test
I wonder if Naka will take a test?