Letting time run out instead of resigning.
Sort:
Not cool at all!
How many seconds and fractions of a second did the person have?
Nov 13, 2018
0
#5
When you have like 45 minutes, not cool, but when you have 5 seconds, it's fine
I just played with someone who didn't play in 7 minutes, losers...
I am cool
It’s a c**t act
Think of it as tribute by the guy who ran away. He gave you the easiest victory in chess. If you don't even have to move to win, there can't be an easier win than that. So by his first tribute is that he felt so overwhelmed by you that he (literally) ran away.
Then the second tribute is that he ran away after giving you the easiest win possible in chess. And the third tribute is that he left you time on the clock to enjoy this victory while you surf the internet for a few minutes.
Those who abandon chess games and run away are the coolest have become my favorite kind of chess opponents. I don't know why you complain.
Nov 17, 2018
0
#11
They are not my favorite kind tho, its annoying when you have to wait a while.
infuriating. especially in rapid.
People should get banned if their time runs out and they waited for more than a minute and it happens alot
IAMBBW wrote:
YOU BUMPER
?
Feb 20, 2019
0
#18
In our club we call running the clock in lost positions "the salty sit"
9497010838 wrote:
Maybe they’re hoping the winning opponent suddenly dies of a heart attack? At least it’s better than the belly-crawling decent into vacation mode.
The chances are extremely low
Wow. Not cool.