[Do not advertise other chess sites - Mod.] elo
Sort:
Assuming I'm thinking of the correct place, I think the ratings are more inflated. I'm rated 1800 over there and I think the leaderboards have some people 3000+
Can't mod the url.
But in general, you're basing a lot of this on your experience and point of view. Most sites have inflated ratings. And from reading a post I found on [the site that shall not be named] people listed their ratings on both sites and they were lower on chess.com. That means a 2000 on chess.com would generally be stronger than on the other site (that is perfectly fine with people mentioning chess.com so I'm not sure why there's an issue with this post. Doesn't seem like an advertisement at all). In the end it doesn't really matter. Just play. Ratings help you match with other players. Beyond that it doesn't mean anything.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
What's your thoughts about [Do not advertise other chess sites - Mod.] Many people say elo is inflatable,but I really feel like the players are very strong and to be honest stronger than chess.com.For instance,someone with 2000 elo at [Do not advertise other chess sites - Mod.]. is stronger than a 2000 here.Even the Gms(watching them by TV) are better.Here they almost always blunder while at [Do not advertise other chess sites - Mod.] it's almost impossible.However.thats how I feel and I would like to tell me your thoughts too. Thank you