Make up a (dumb) opening and name it!

This one is "The Clinton" . Also known as The Transvestite

And last but not least, this "The Great Wall of Trump"

That is the petroff defense

look it up bruh 

(About #43)

That's also one of the rare of this thread that could actually be seriously played (by bad players, especially white but still). As a duras gambit player I usually don't go Nc6 in response of e5 (and think it's meh, but Duras Gambit is meh anyway), but I would be delighted if white answers me that way, and rightfully.

    Patzer attack Queen trap defense.

I always thought that a good way to beat a computer would be to make some weird moves to 'trick' it.

In the same spirit, Duras Gambit Queen trap Variation.

A third one.

Barnes Queen trap attack

All that is happening is trading a queen for a rook and a bishop, not "winning" it

Despite the point count, having a queen is usually better than having a bshop and a rook. From the final position, the rook is already lost (or traded for a bishop, along with a pawn), so it really is only a queen for bishop trade, technically not winning a queen, but winning the material back.

Anyway, I was nowhere serious when talking about "winning the queen" because the player with a "trapped" queen has not even to try hard to untrap the her, and ends up with a monstruous advantage, both material and positional (maybe just material in Barnes').

The Kunta Kinte Opening

Openings 3 moves long (or shorter) will have higher chances of winning.

e.g.

The "fuck it defense"

The Three Little Pigs.

Here is my opening: I call it the bishop's gambit. But I'm going to expand it a lot, this is the base: