You don't even know how to play a game of chess
MASSIVE Losing Streak - Help needed!
Sort:
pfren wrote:
Hey, that's great.
Too bad that the Australian Open is held every two years, and this Christmas it wasn't held.
Obviously, I'm referring to last year's tournament?
https://sites.google.com/view/aus-open-chess-2019
So you lost the last argument and now you'll just try to troll wherever you can.
What a sad old man you are.😔
He does this all the time, I think it's best to just ignore him tbh.
Bramblyspam wrote:
I wouldn't expect so many blunders from a NM, but then again, this is blitz, so I don't have a good frame of reference for what's "normal". I don't really play blitz, I just play daily games.
I get it, but come on everybody blunders.
Look at his profile, he is one of the few to have actually beaten the infamous ChessBrah with a 2976 rating.
This NM is basically a superstar.
But let's look at this game, please.
He made Excellent/Best moves through the entire time, but then his opponent gained the upper hand due to a minor inaccuracy which was quickly escalated to a crushing win.
Have you ever seen a 2100 guy play that perfectly, especially in a Blitz Game?🤔
His opponent literally played an immaculate game.
Jan 16, 2020
0
#47
why did he play 24.kf2 it costed him a knight for a rook that should lead to a win for black
True, that was a blunder. What would you have played after 23.Bg5?
The rook must stay on that file because of the pending pawn push, so an exchange sac wouldn't be that bad, don't you think? Just without checks of course.
Move 68 game C he blundered his queen
Jan 16, 2020
0
#50
Colby-Covington wrote:
True, that was a blunder. What would you have played after 23.Bg5?
The rook must stay on that file because of the pending pawn push, so an exchange sac wouldn't be that bad, don't you think? Just without checks of course.
probably Rf2
Great analysis!
I totally agree, he had B&C in the bag with a very similar outlook in D.
He can definitely draw a lot from this and I think he'll especially heed your advice because of your a higher rating which is closer to his own. I see that you are a fellow Blitz player so you definitely understand the struggle.
Tell me what you think of this one from just now?
That's basically the main opening that think is causing most of the issues.
Jan 16, 2020
0
#52
Looks like basic tactical blunders (mostly hanging pieces or pawns) are the culprit. I can see these pretty quickly even as a lowly ~1600 rated blitz player. Only exception was the last game where the Danish gambit is simply not a sound opening if the opponent defends correctly against it (which is not an easy task).
Jan 16, 2020
0
#53
Bramblyspam wrote:
I'm not seeing a pile of cheaters, I'm seeing your guy hanging a bunch of pieces to some very simple tactics. I wouldn't expect so many blunders from a NM, but then again, this is blitz, so I don't have a good frame of reference for what's "normal". I don't really play blitz, I just play daily games.
👏👏👏
Solution;
play each other.
Colby-Covington έγραψε:
He does this all the time, I think it's best to just ignore him tbh.
If the problem is the opening, try this opening for white,
or this one for black, its the best for each!
#63, LOL!!!.
I must factually observe that you, dear IM PFren, have not yet achieved this eternal secret yourself, lol.
True it's not overly indicative of true skill, but if you play regularly it can become important to you, individually.
Also, a lot of tournament buddies often check your accounts.
Yeah, I am FIDE rated, 2227.
We actually represented Germany during the Australian Open shortly after Christmas.
Hey, that's great.
Too bad that the Australian Open is held every two years, and this Christmas it wasn't held.
You don't even know how to lie convincingly, dude.