oh man ! that won game was after 82 moves ! how possibly do you call it a masterpiece ? usually they demonestrate their win in 17 or 20 moves against a master or someone ,anyway your opponent was good so generally that's great ,actually you didn't know how to use your advantage to get a faster win and that took you long !
Me vs The Computer
Sort:
Hussein47 wrote:
oh man ! that won game was after 82 moves ! how possibly do you call it a masterpiece ? usually they demonestrate their win in 17 or 20 moves against a master or someone ,anyway your opponent was good so generally that's great ,actually you didn't know how to use your advantage to get a faster win and that took you long !
Thank you for your input.
Actually, I am just a beginner at chess, and I am not calling those games 'masterpieces'. I won against this program after losing more than 20 games!!!
However, I posted the games in order to receive useful comments, especially for the second game. If you suggest a better continuation for it, please post it in a chess board in the comment.
Mar 20, 2011
0
#4
actually dear hasan ,winning with a queen and king against rook and king is not really easy and I don't even know how to do that(in your second game !) but somthing's really certain about it ,just don't check your opponent's king when you can ,always have plans for that ,just keep checking the king will not accomplish you anything ! it only adds to the number of moves !
Here are two games that I played against the famous program Kasparov Chessmate. Feel free to post any comments.
They are my best games ever, the time was set to 90 minutes.