Mega Blunders

  • #1
    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • #2

    Did Lasker really won on that case where he would lose his knight on b2?

  • #3

    Yeah, that knight was supposed to be on e2. 

  • #4

    Ill hopefully post a few more in my next article

  • #5

    This origin of this position is unclear. In Game Explorer, it's from Oakley P vs Nash W , but I've also seen it attributed to Feuerstein - Bennett, 1955.

  • #6

    In the first post, where Karpov blunder 75: Qf3???, why can't black play 75: ... Kc4, with a slightly worse game?

    I could understand if it was Qb3?!, allowing black to draw with 75: ... stalemate!!.

  • #7

    @nick_p12:

    Why not 3.. Ne5+ ?



  • #8

    I dont get OPs post, those diagrams are not correct.

  • #9
    ViktorHNielsen wrote:

    In the first post, where Karpov blunder 75: Qf3???, why can't black play 75: ... Kc4, with a slightly worse game?

    I could understand if it was Qb3?!, allowing black to draw with 75: ... stalemate!!.


    Well it seems to me that i made a lot of mistakes

    The Bishop is supposed to be on e6 for that diagram

  • #10
    Rasparovov wrote:

    I dont get OPs post, those diagrams are not correct.


    I kinda was in a hurry and made some mega blunders.

    Hopefully wont repeat them   :D

  • #11
    Winnie_Pooh wrote:

    @nick_p12:

    Why not 3.. Ne5+ ?

     



    You have a good point and like a said in my description he had an isolated pawn (d - pawn) which I had forgotten to show in the diagram. Thanks for pointing it out.

    If you wanna see that game for furthur clarifications I suggest you to check out the link below

    http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008303

    Thanks anyways,
     

Top
or Join

Online Now