Most useles piece!

I am here because I keep losing because of the King, so that is why he is the most useless piece on this board. If the king was not there I would have won big time. 

I just got angry and then I searched up most useless piece. 

I wish the king piece in chess never existed, without the king winning could be easier for people; especially beginners. 

Oh OK, rooks can be useless if you use it incorrectly. Rook is only good for the end game not the start of the game. 

Also real name a you a good chess player?

I like bishops as well also want to be friends?

Just add me and I will take the offer. 

I think I hate knights the most they are so annoying sometimes. How are the weaknesses of knights? 

I hate knights, but they can be useful when you use them right. 

The pawn behind the pawn behind another pawn. It cannot move till the other two pawns moves or captured.

 Depends on the position sir.

The piece that is the weakest is the king also because, he can't do anything otherwise he might be captured. The king is never useful at all. 

How do you checkmate someone in a few moves? 

The king has to be in a captured position before CHECKMATE can happen. Also chat died. 

Dowble /triple pawns, are you saying side pawns like " a , h" pawns in middle game, yes (side pawns are quite useless in middle games but more valuable than centre pawns in endgames with few pieces though). If those pawns are centre pawns " covering 16 key squares of centres in the middle game, I will lovely keep those pawns and sit my minor pieces and hook with them. ( a pawn cover two squares, so 4 possible lovely seats for minor pieces)

Wow what is going on here?

Also Duck is not a piece by the way. 

here are pieces of duck then

I never heard of Duck chess, but the Bobby was a chess grand master if he played now he would smash us.