Forums

My analysis of Carlsen Anand 2014 game 2

Sort:
Mister-Horse
Mister-Horse
Nov 9, 2014
0
#1

Carlsen's best move was 14. B5
He moved his bishop there to take advantage of that small diagonal for strategical purposes. Anand was not able to defend along that line. Anand's reply was a6, which cost Anand a tempo, and Carlsen was able to launch a kingside attack successfully as a result. You see, Carlsen's plan in this game two was gain space on the queen side and then transfer his forces to the kingside which caught Anand of guard.

Anand is an idiot. Very mediocre player. I hope Anand will retire and give someone else a chance. Anand is washed up. I hope Carlsen will have better competition next year.

Mister-Horse
Mister-Horse
Nov 9, 2014
0
#2
chessmicky wrote:

It's always fun to see a weak nonentity call a any-times champion "weak" and "an idiot"

Where is your 'expert' analysis??

Superqueen500
Superqueen500
Nov 9, 2014
0
#3

He's weak compared to Carlsen.

riv4l
riv4l
Nov 9, 2014
0
#4
sadie2 wrote:

you're all rattatouies, i hope bobby fischer wins the next championship, though i'm fine with capablanca too. this is fischers most famous game:

 

 

 


An astounding win for white by Fischer!

Heh you're so funny. not. 

arul_kumar
arul_kumar
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#5

I think the 2nd game was a Ruy Lopez. Post no. 1 is a different game?

Pulpofeira
Pulpofeira
Nov 10, 2014
0
#6

You hope "Anand will retire and give someone else a chance"? Actually all the contestants in last candidates tournament had that chance.

Pulpofeira
Pulpofeira
Nov 10, 2014
0
#7

He must not be that bad if the others need him to retire to have a chance.

MuhammadAreez10
MuhammadAreez10
Nov 10, 2014
0
#8

chessmicky wrote:

It's always fun to see a weak nonentity call a any-times champion "weak" and "an idiot"

Areez writes:- Perfect response!

TJBChess
TJBChess
Closed: Inactive
Nov 10, 2014
0
#9
DefeatIsYourDestiny1 wrote:
chessmicky wrote:

It's always fun to see a weak nonentity call a any-times champion "weak" and "an idiot"

Where is your 'expert' analysis??

99% of the time when the non master "experts" give their opinion on a match, it goes something like this:

and so forth and so forth... Tongue Out

Much better is:

http://www.chess.com/blog/ChessNetwork/game-2---2014-world-chess-championship---magnus-carlsen-vs-viswanathan-anand

MuhammadAreez10
MuhammadAreez10
Nov 10, 2014
0
#10

Haha!

TMHgn
TMHgn
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#11

Stupid OP did not even manage to look at the correct game. Beyond ridiculous.

pfren
IM pfren
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#12
arul_kumar wrote:

I think the 2nd game was a Ruy Lopez. Post no. 1 is a different game?

It's the sixth game of the 1972 Spassky- Fischer match, something that a good troll will never tell you.

Pulpofeira
Pulpofeira
Nov 10, 2014
0
#13

He should have posted the Evergreen.

Pulpofeira
Pulpofeira
Nov 10, 2014
0
#14

Not fair! Two guys facing only one!

pfren
IM pfren
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#15

Needless to say, today Fischer's 14.Bb5 is regarded as dubious, due to the very strong pawn sacrifice 14...Qb7! (initially suggested by Ludek Pachman) when Black is at least equal.

pfren
IM pfren
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#16

Well, it's not that hard to recall a game which is deservedly included to the best ever played- is it? It is a positional masterpiece, regardless of the actual accuracy of 14.Bb5.

lutak22
lutak22
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#17

uh no offence here but game to started off 1. e4 1...e5

lutak22
lutak22
Show your flair!
Nov 10, 2014
0
#18

game two*

RonaldJosephCote
RonaldJosephCote
Nov 10, 2014
0
#19

                    Jesus Christ!   thread # 7   Cry

DiogenesDue
DiogenesDue
Nov 10, 2014
0
#20

Here's my analysis of this thread:

The OP falls just above the 9th circle.