my opponent is stupid
Sort:
ChePlaSsYer wrote:
Why is your blitz 500 but your rapid rating 1900?
Lets just say that this account wont be opened very long.
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
Said the guy that lost in 12 moves.
A 15 minutes game with a rating of 1848 and such moves? Even people with 800 or 900 wouldn't play this way.
CookedQueen wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
Said the guy that lost in 12 moves.
A 15 minutes game with a rating of 1848 and such moves? Even people with 800 or 900 wouldn't play this way.
Like i said. This account wont be open very long.
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
Like i said. This account wont be open very long.
And then the topic title makes sense 
CookedQueen wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
Like i said. This account wont be open very long.
And then the topic title makes sense
Yep...someone else thinking they invented the wheel. Who will be the first person that reports them?
2Q1C wrote:
So is he cheating at rapid or sandbagging at blitz?
Why do you mention the "C" word, and then tell others not to?
Nevermind..I already know the answer.
2Q1C wrote:
So is he cheating at rapid or sandbagging at blitz?
Who cares. We have established he is complete di@khead
Mar 14, 2017
0
#12
This game was clearly played between two engines, probably neither of which were Stockfish:
https://www.chess.com/live/game/1995887357?username=lukethomas04
https://en.lichess.org/OPxCFjck#74
Said game where i lost in 12 moves was friend playing perhaps you would like to see this game
check this out I played black pieces opponent abandoned game. If you want proof check my game archive lukethomas04 vs Checker0
Mar 14, 2017
0
#14
Not surprisingly, the opponent has a 1900 blitz rating that comes from mainly 10 minute and 5+incremement "blitz" games.
lukethomas04 wrote:
Poor sportsmanship to shame your opponent like this. You can't be that clever yourself.
Mar 14, 2017
0
#16
This other game played by the OP was clearly also engine vs engine.
https://www.chess.com/live/game/1995932577?username=aa1001
https://en.lichess.org/p2ns4fIF#25
Given the 3 centipawn loss by both sides, it's clear neither of them bothered to make any of their own moves or anything to even attempt to hide it.
Pay attention.
Mar 14, 2017
0
#18
We're saying that you, 2q1c, could probably destroy the OP blindfolded, if he's playing without an engine.
Mar 14, 2017
0
#19
But what's the point of this thread anyway? Bragging over one successful game?
