my opponent not accepting drawn?

1. Double check that you actually have a forced draw so as to not make a complete arse of yourself.
2. If you have, take a chill pill and play it out. You can claim a draw once the position repeats itself for the third time or 50 moves went by without capture or pawn move. At least the former should be doable very quickly. My suspicion is if you have been playing this out for almost a month now you don't have a clear perpetual check, or at least not one that will end in a draw by threefold repetition.
EDIT: Checked the actual game. You're going to be at it for a while I'm afraid. I would not ever accept a draw as white in that kind of position. Earn it.

If you're talking about the game against 45kadir there is a forced draw on board, but there are other variations that could lead to his victory. Seeing that you didn't take the Rook en prise your opponent has reasons to believe that you won't find perpetual check.
P.S. In the other game your opponent has mate in 1. Still you didn't surender?

I don't know anything about your opponent, but unless he's a fairly advanced player I'd cut him a break. For beginners and intermediates (like me), it's far from obvious WHY a particular "drawn" game is drawn. He may want to take your game to its logical conclusion so that he can learn exactly how a draw plays out, and how to better understand its diagnostic features.
In addition, you seem more than a bit frustrated, which is not bad for the other guy's prospects. Is your opponent aggrieved? spitting nails? ready to saw his hand off to end the game? That's just another way of saying that he's RATTLED. And if he's rattled, his chances of making a blunder increase. If I were your opponent, I might decide that I have a realistic chance of irritating you to the point of self-sabotage.

The only reason you have a queen at all was he just plain let you move your pawn up and queen. He should have simply taken your pawn on move 40.
He's playing within the rules. If you can manage to force a 3 times repetition, or to hit the 50 move rule, then you can claim your draw. Until that happens, he has the perfect right to ignore your draw offers if he wants.
Have you actually asked him in the chat about a draw? I know that I often miss that a draw was even offered if someone doesn't say something about it, and I know that I've offered draws before (and mentioned it in chat, as I always do) and had the other person move, then respond "Oh, I didn't realize that you had offered a draw. If you send it again I'll accept it".
If you offer your opponent a draw and he refuses, IMO it's rude to keep asking for a draw. You've made the offer, he's said no, and he shouldn't have to keep saying "no" every time you ask.
ken, why are you calling your opponent an idiot? People are not obligated to accept draw offers. The best way for you to get a draw is TO FORCE IT.
Nice echecs06., how do i call him then? handsome? lol.. until now he's going once every 2 days, i keep checking him more than 40 moves. I did'nt know about an option "FORCE IT" is there any option like this?
Check him 40 more times and hope he doesn't find a way to move a pawn.
its more than 40 moves, there's no way to move his pawn up. thanks mate
I don't know anything about your opponent, but unless he's a fairly advanced player I'd cut him a break. For beginners and intermediates (like me), it's far from obvious WHY a particular "drawn" game is drawn. He may want to take your game to its logical conclusion so that he can learn exactly how a draw plays out, and how to better understand its diagnostic features.
In addition, you seem more than a bit frustrated, which is not bad for the other guy's prospects. Is your opponent aggrieved? spitting nails? ready to saw his hand off to end the game? That's just another way of saying that he's RATTLED. And if he's rattled, his chances of making a blunder increase. If I were your opponent, I might decide that I have a realistic chance of irritating you to the point of self-sabotage.
you're same as him, tnx mate..
If you're talking about the game against 45kadir there is a forced draw on board, but there are other variations that could lead to his victory. Seeing that you didn't take the Rook en prise your opponent has reasons to believe that you won't find perpetual check.
P.S. In the other game your opponent has mate in 1. Still you didn't surender?
your comment is not relevant, did you understand my post?